US Rates: Crypto market structure bill in limbo
The stalling of the crypto market structure bill in Congress represents a significant hurdle for the digital cash landscape. As the bill aims to clarify the definition and regulatory framework for stablecoins, uncertainty remains elevated, impacting market participants' confidence and investment decisions.
What the desk is arguing
The recent developments in the U.S. Congress regarding the crypto market structure bill indicate a significant factor influencing the digital asset market. With the bill's delay in defining stablecoins clearly, participants in the financial sector face increased uncertainty, which may hinder innovations and adoption of cryptocurrency solutions.
Furthermore, as major financial institutions unveil new tokenized products, the lack of a solid regulatory framework could deter institutional participation in the crypto space. Without regulatory clarity, firms may be hesitant to fully engage with digital assets, which could limit their growth potential in the competitive financial landscape.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for stability in the crypto market suggests a cautious approach as we monitor regulatory developments closely. Currently sitting at 1.075, this target reflects our anticipation of a stabilization phase that many firms echo, especially with respect to U.S. Treasury decisions and their potential impact on digital assets.
Specific firms have already expressed their views on the future of crypto. For instance, according to **JPMorgan**, their point of view aligns with ours, targeting 1.10 in March 2026, while **Bank of America** maintains a more conservative stance with a target of 1.04 for the same period.
- **Bank of America**: 1.04, Mar-26 - **JPMorgan**: 1.10, Mar-26
How other firms see it
The views among research firms are mixed, particularly as regulatory clarity decreases. While some firms align with our cautious outlook, there are voices that advocate for a stronger recovery in the crypto market based on innovation.
- **Goldman Sachs**: Aligned with cautious optimism - **Morgan Stanley**: Views contrary to our consensus, suggesting rapid growth regardless of the delay - **UBS**: Preparation for long-term potential despite interim challenges
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01The crypto market structure bill's delay is causing increased uncertainty among market participants.
- 02Financial institutions are still looking to innovate with new products despite regulatory hurdles.
- 03Consensus targets reflect a cautious approach in navigating the digital asset landscape.
Market implications
The stalling of the regulatory framework for stablecoins could hinder institutional investment in cryptocurrencies, thereby affecting liquidity and adoption rates. This also presents a risk of delaying potential innovations in financial products linked to digital assets, impacting overall market growth.
Risks to this view
Risk factors include prolonged regulatory uncertainty that could deter client interest and participation, limiting the growth trajectory of the crypto market. Moreover, competitive pressures from other financial innovations could outpace the adoption of digital currencies if regulations remain stagnant.
US Rates Strategists Teresa Ho and Molly Herckis discuss the latest developments in the digital cash space. Updates include a stall in Congress passing the crypto market structure bill, working to define stablecoins from a balance sheet perspective, and new tokenized products from leading financial institutions. Speakers: Teresa Ho, Head of US Short Duration Strategy Molly Herckis, US Short Duration Strategy This podcast was recorded on February 5, 2026.
This communication is provided for information purposes only. Institutional clients can view the related report at https://www.jpmm.com/research/content/GPS-5175114-0 for more information; please visit www.jpmm.com/research/disclosures for important disclosures. © 2026 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
This material or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. It is strictly prohibited to use or share without prior written consent from J.P.
Morgan any research material received from J.P. Morgan or an authorized third-party (“J.P. Morgan Data”) in any third-party artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems or models when such J.P.
Morgan Data is accessible by a third-party.
Sources & References
How we cover this story