Skip to content
← Commentary feed
UBS ON AIR

UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'MORE MARKET ANGST'

Recent developments have heightened market anxiety, primarily driven by geopolitical tensions around a fire at an Emirati nuclear facility attributed to a drone incident. Per the full note source, this event, combined with Donald Trump's incendiary comments regarding Iran, has left traders on edge, particularly as Iranian media dismiss the likelihood of an imminent US-Iran deal. Looking to oil prices, there's concern as they remain significantly below the levels needed to balance supply and demand without depleting reserves. These dynamics set the stage for a cautious trading environment as market participants await further developments.

What the desk is arguing

The desk frames this as a notable escalation in geopolitical risks that could influence market volatility. Such incidents often lead to heightened uncertainty, particularly in the energy sector, which has significant implications for FX markets.

Oil prices, a critical indicator for market sentiment, remain notably low. Current trading levels suggest persistent oversupply issues, with prices unable to recover sufficiently, thus weighing on currencies tied closely to oil, particularly in the GCC region.

Where it sits in our coverage

Our consensus target for the relevant currency pairs aligns with the current market sentiment, with a target of 1.075 and a range reflecting conservative expectations.

How other firms see it

There is alignment among various companies that emphasize the geopolitical risk narrative. For example, jpmorgan holds a target of 1.10, reflecting a similar stance. Conversely, bofa offers a low target of 1.04, suggesting more caution in the market outlook.

The conversations around oil market stability could intersect with currency pairs heavily reliant on oil exports, such as USD/CAD, urging traders to remain vigilant on those fronts.

How firms align with this view

consensus1.0750range1.04001.1200

Aligned with the desk view

Contrary positioning

Key takeaways

  • 01Geopolitical tensions are rising amid drone incidents in the UAE.
  • 02Oil prices remain low, impacting currency pairs related to energy.
  • 03Market sentiment is currently cautious due to geopolitical risks.
  • 04The lack of an imminent US-Iran deal further intensifies market angst.

Market implications

Traders should monitor oil price movements closely as further clashes or resolutions in the Middle East may lead to significant shifts in market sentiment. The $70 per barrel marker could be pivotal in reassessing risk in relevant currency pairs.

Risks to this view

A de-escalation of tensions, particularly a swift resolution regarding US-Iran relations or a recovery in oil prices toward equilibrium levels, could invalidate the current bearish sentiment and lead to an unexpected rally in related currencies.

ubs

Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Monday the 18th of May. News of an unidentified drone causing a fire at a nuclear plant in the United Arab Emirates has not helped to calm financial markets.

Given that Iran claims it wants nuclear power for civilian purposes, attacking nuclear facilities in the region might be construed as emphasising the Iranian government's position that it only wants what others already have, whatever the credibility of that particular viewpoint. US President Trump was using capital letters in social media posts about Iran over the weekend while Iranian media suggested no compromise with the United States was imminent. Oil prices are still not at the levels required to balance supply and demand and so stockpiles are having to be used.

But as stockpiles decline, the economic pressure increases. US gasoline prices remain above $4.50 per US gallon elsewhere. There are, however, reports of progress on a trade deal between the Gulf Cooperation Council states and the United Kingdom.

It's not immediately market-relevant news, but in the longer term there are important questions about where the reconstruction budget and rearmament budgets of the Gulf countries will be spent. China's April economic data was weaker than expected, with retail sales and industrial production well below the worst estimates within the forecast ranges. The retail sales number was basically static and this underscores the long-term challenge for China.

That is to say that the domestic economy has only produced the most mediocre of growth recently. However, China's domestic demand is not necessarily a major international concern, given the trade position of China is of some relevance in Southeast Asia, but less so globally. The industrial production data was bad on the headline, but somewhat mixed in the detail.

Some of the more oil-intensive sectors were dragging down the headline – metal and plastic production, for instance. Sectors that depend on external demand were often better – auto manufacturing and electronic manufacturing, for instance, saw accelerating output. Spain had local elections in Andalucía, where the far-right increased their support.

This follows far-right gains in UK local council elections and is a reminder of the general level of political risk in most major economies these days. Economic uncertainty and fear of the future, especially a fear of a loss of social status, can encourage the twin movements of scapegoat economics and prejudice politics, which naturally tend to increase support for more extreme political parties across the political spectrum. Spain's local result doesn't mean much right now – a general election is not due until 2027.

But as with the UK vote, it's a reminder that markets are going to struggle to properly price political risks. The rest of the data calendar today is quiet. There are a few central bank speakers kicking around – the Bank of England and the European Central Bank are both being represented.

But central banks need information on second-round inflation effects to make informed decisions on interest rates. And we do not have that information as yet. That means either we get bland comments or we get uninformed comments.

Both are, of course, possible. That's all for today. Have a good day.

The investment views have been prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS Switzerland AG, regulated by FINMA in Switzerland. It's subsidiaries, or affiliates, collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC.

The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient.

This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.

Sources & References

How we cover this story

FX Bank Forecast aggregates and indexes public bank-research RSS, press releases, and FX commentary. Firm and pair tagging are heuristic — verify against the original source before trading. We do not endorse third-party content.

FX BANK FORECAST · COVERAGE

Institutional FX coverage in your inbox

Aggregated year-end forecasts, scenario shifts, and curated analyst notes from eight institutional desks. No promotion.