UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Uncertain times'
Overview — In the face of increasing uncertainty, the desk sees potential stagnation in US corporate behavior that could adversely impact economic growth. Per the full note from UBS's Paul Donovan, the Federal Reserve's Beige Book highlighted mentions of 'uncertain' and 'uncertainty' over 50 times, reflecting significant apprehension among US firms regarding trade policies and labor markets. This sentiment contrasts sharply with a mere 14 mentions in May 2024, suggesting a notable escalation in corporate caution. Moving forward, traders should closely watch economic data releases and central bank communications as pivotal influences on market behavior.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that the rising frequency of 'uncertain' references in key economic reports signifies a risk of corporate paralysis in the US economy. Increased caution can inhibit hiring and investment, potentially stunting innovation and overall growth. This viewpoint is fortified by Donovan's notes on the structural changes and policy uncertainties that plague current corporate decision-making.
Supporting data from the July Beige Book indicate a precarious economic landscape, with mentions of uncertainty suggesting a retreat from growth-oriented strategies. The shift from 14 mentions in May 2024 to over 50 this month signals that fear is prevalent across various sectors, underscoring the challenges posed by trade policy and labor market dynamics.
While some may argue that the cautiousness reflects prudent risk management, the desk believes the protracted wait-and-see approach could foster stagnation, leading to longer-term repercussions for economic performance.
Where it sits in our coverage
Current consensus targets for the USD reflect a range centered around 1.075, with jpmorgan projecting a target of 1.10 and bofa positioning lower at 1.04. The desk's perspective aligns closely with jpmorgan’s view given the rising uncertainty indicators and their potential to impact currency valuation negatively.
However, should conditions eventually improve or if there's a decisive change in trade policy, the desk’s forecast could align more tightly with the lower end of the target spectrum, as reflected in bofa's more cautious stance.
How other firms see it
Many firms similarly observe increased caution in economic forecasting, with those aligned including jpmorgan and citi emphasizing risk management due to uncertainties. Conversely, firms like bofa maintain a more pessimistic outlook, suggesting a continued downturn based on labor market metrics.
Focus on the evolving narrative within the USD/JPY and AUD/USD pairs as they are sensitive to US economic sentiment and central bank positioning. Watch for correlations between USD strength against the backdrop of domestic employment data releases.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Increased uncertainty in corporate sentiment signals potential hiring and investment stagnation.
- 02Over 50 mentions of 'uncertain' in the Beige Book underscore a drastic shift in economic outlook.
- 03Comparative analysis against last year’s trade-related uncertainty highlights escalating risks.
- 04The corporate wait-and-see approach could inhibit growth and innovation.
Market implications
Market players should monitor USD movements closely near the 1.075 level following the Beige Book commentary. Additionally, alignment or deviations in the behavior of related pairs such as USD/JPY can signal broader shifts in market sentiment as more economic data is released.
Risks to this view
The primary risk to this outlook is a sudden positive reversal in trade policy or labor market conditions that could re-establish confidence among corporations. A robust jobs report or a significant reduction in trade tensions could mitigate the currently bearish sentiment and lead to positioning adjustments.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at GBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Thursday the 4th of June. The US Federal Reserve's Beige Book, a collection of economic anecdote and gossip, mentioned uncertain or uncertainty no fewer than 50 times this month, and that is before the recent tariff announcements.
That's not as high as the 80 mentions that came after tariffs were imposed last year, but it compares to just 14 mentions in May of 2024. That rather seems to sum up the main challenge facing the US economy today. The erratic nature of trade policy, the consequences of a war of which the US administration seems to have little control, difficulties with labour policy and so forth, have worked to paralyse key aspects of corporate behaviour.
The wait-and-see approach obviously has some merits when confronted by uncertainty, but the problem with doing that is that doing nothing can become addictive. If US companies start to feel the world is so uncertain they're better off just doing nothing indefinitely, then hiring stagnates, investment stagnates and innovation stagnates. The world is uncertain because we're in the middle of a great deal of structural change, but the US has then layered on extreme policy uncertainty.
The US labour market is one of the central concerns in this story of corporate paralysis. Today there are various rather unsatisfactory data releases. US initial jobless claims are fine as far as they go, but they fail to properly capture the no-hire aspect of the current corporate policy, because people generally have to work beforehand to be able to claim benefits.
The unit labour cost and productivity data rests on the reliability of GDP data, and GDP data is not terribly reliable. The challenger job layoff numbers only survey a tiny fraction of the layoffs that will have taken place in any given month in the United States. While large companies and the government may publicly announce their job layoffs, the small mom-and-pop store does not, and self-employed people certainly do not, and yet most people are employed outside of government and big companies.
Markets have been largely unmoved by the announcement of a ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, mainly because we've been here before. This ceasefire is necessary because the previously announced ceasefire did not work. The House of Representatives' vote to end the war against Iran is a gesture, but at the margin markets may see this as additional pressure on US President Trump to make further concessions to Iran.
The problem is that markets have no idea what the Iranian side expects, or how many concessions will need to be made by the US. The optimism bias remains in markets, but that does not stretch to a gullibility bias. Investors are not inclined to take statements from the US administration at face value.
The calendar today is pretty light. European April retail sales data are old data and foreshadowed by the regional numbers. European Central Bank President Lagarde is speaking, but the ECB seems determined to march towards its policy era with grim and somewhat incomprehensible determination.
Swedish May consumer price inflation was a little higher than expected, although so few economists forecast this number as to make expected a rather abstract concept. The numbers showed the inevitable energy price pressures, up to a point, but there are no real lessons here for overall developed economy inflation trends. That's all for today.
Have a good day. ...collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research.
This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS.
Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story