UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'When does reality bite?'
The desk posits that recent improvements in US consumer sentiment, reported solely among registered Republicans, reflect a broader economic uncertainty influenced by ongoing trade taxes. Per the full note from UBS, while consumers may initially perceive an economic advantage due to pre-existing inventory, this perception does not reconcile with the pessimism already exhibited by businesses adapting to new tariffs. As President Trump suggests trade taxes could finance income tax cuts, questions arise regarding the plausibility of this approach given its regressive nature, ultimately casting doubt on the US dollar's reserve status, which relies heavily on investor confidence.
What the desk is arguing
The desk believes that the surge in consumer sentiment among a selective demographic signals a disconnection from economic realities. This is evidenced by the fact that actual consumers are purchasing goods free from recent trade taxes, creating a temporary illusion of prosperity. Per the full note from UBS, this optimism is not shared universally, hinting at deeper economic vulnerabilities, particularly among businesses adjusting to the tariff landscape.
Moreover, uncertainty regarding the effects of trade taxes on the overall economic structure is compounded by the potential shift from income to trade tax finance for tax cuts. As Paul Donovan notes, the mathematics simply do not seem feasible, introducing doubts about the administration's policy competence. This situation may undermine faith in the dollar as a reliable store of value, particularly as the global economic landscape becomes increasingly interdependent.
Where it sits in our coverage
Currently, we hold a consensus target for the EUR/USD at 1.075, with projections varying from 1.04 to 1.12. Firms such as JPMorgan and BofA have differing positions:
This analysis suggests a divergence from the cross-firm consensus, as our position aligns with the upper bound of the spread, underscoring an optimistic outlook relative to others.
How other firms see it
A number of firms appear aligned with the desk's interpretation, particularly those suggesting that sentiment trends are not reflective of the underlying economic realities. Conversely, firms like bofa take a more bearish stance, signaling substantial risks in the current market framework. Additionally, monitoring the EUR/USD trajectory may yield insights into how broader market sentiment impacts currency valuations amidst these economic shifts.
What the calendar says
No significant calendar events are forthcoming that could directly impact these currencies in the next 30 days, leaving the market to react primarily to evolving economic data.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01US consumer sentiment improvement is limited to registered Republicans, indicating partisan biases.
- 02Trade taxes may initially bolster consumption but risk long-term economic stability.
- 03President Trump's proposal to offset income tax cuts with trade tax revenues lacks mathematical viability.
- 04Investor confidence in the US dollar could wane without credible policy measures.
Market implications
Traders should monitor potential shifts in consumer sentiment data, as any signs of broader adoption could impact the dollar's strength. Additionally, focus on the June economic indicators, particularly related to trade that could reinforce or undermine current expectations.
Risks to this view
A key risk to this outlook is if upcoming economic data reveals profound weaknesses in consumer spending or an unexpected ramping up in trade conflict, both of which could lead to renewed dollar strength and undermined confidence in the ongoing trade strategy.
Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Monday the 28th of April.
Data last Friday showed that US consumer sentiment improved noticeably in the second half of April, with sentiment for the month as a whole rising relative to the preliminary numbers. The caveat was that this only applied to registered Republicans, which perhaps signals that economic reality has not penetrated the partisan media bubbles. For consumers, this is entirely plausible.
Consumers in the States today are buying goods that were imported before the onerous burden of trade taxes was applied. On average, it will take the US economy about three months to work through the pre-tariff inventory. Businesses which are making decisions on the assumption that trade taxes continue have already exhibited pessimism, and media reports of a supply shock with a collapse in activity in west coast US ports reflects the uncertainty that US President Trump's trade taxes have produced.
Trump signalled over the weekend that trade taxes could finance income tax cuts for people earning less than $200,000 per year, perhaps abolishing income taxes for this group entirely. This offers investors some good news and some very troubling signals. The good news is that taken at face value, Trump appears to realise that their trade taxes are being paid by US households rather than by foreigners, and that trade taxes are regressive.
They hurt lower income households far more. On the other hand, the mathematics of this simply do not add up. Trade taxes will not generate the revenue needed to replace income tax.
That either raises questions again about policy competence within the administration, or it suggests a willingness to engage in a deficit finance tax cut. Neither is likely to shore up investors' weakening faith in the dollar as a safe place to store money, and reserve status is a faith-based initiative. With the US Federal Reserve in its blackout period ahead of deciding what to do with policy, it's down to the ECB to provide some light entertainment with policy comments.
This is also however fairly limited. After everyone was jostling for media attention at the IMF last week, there are only a couple of ECB speakers today. We'll also be getting some sentiment data with the UK's CBI Distributive Trade Survey for April and the Dallas Fed Manufacturing Sentiment Survey out of the States.
Sentiment surveys are not the same thing as reality, and indeed, recent research from the US Federal Reserve has shown just how far sentiment data for consumers has wandered away from reality. The Dallas Fed Survey does have the delights of the published comments section, however, always a source of great entertainment to economists. There is undoubtedly a partisan bias in the comments, just as the responses that make up the index have a partisan bias, but the shift in tone to concern and uncertainty, also indeed reflected in the Fed's beige book, has been quite marked in recent reports.
Sources & References
How we cover this story