Skip to content
ING THINK

Hormuz oil shock tilts shipping towards alternative fuels

13 May 2026, 10:41 UTCRead full speech on think.ing.com
Share

At a Glance

The desk posits that the current oil price shock is catalyzing a shift towards alternative fuels in the shipping sector, particularly liquefied natural gas (LNG) and methanol. Per the full note from ing-think, LNG is becoming increasingly attractive compared to traditional bunker fuels, while methanol is gaining traction as a viable alternative. This trend is expected to enhance the competitiveness of these fuels, although the emissions benefits remain limited. Our analysis aligns with this view, particularly as we observe the ongoing volatility in oil prices, which could further accelerate this transition.

Key Takeaways

  • 01Oil price shock from Hormuz disruption boosts LNG and methanol cost competitiveness vs. conventional bunker fuels.
  • 02LNG benefits most, but emission reductions remain limited, tempering environmental gains.
  • 03Methanol readiness becomes more attractive, though infrastructure challenges persist.

Full Analysis

What the desk is arguing

The current oil price shock is making alternative fuels more cost competitive in the shipping sector. LNG benefits the most, becoming even more attractive compared to conventional bunker fuels.

Methanol is also becoming more viable, strengthening the case for methanol-ready vessels. Still, the emissions benefits remain limited, implying that the shift is primarily economic rather than environmental.

The desk implicitly rejects the view that alternative fuels will only become viable under tighter emissions regulations, arguing that price dynamics alone can trigger adoption.

Where it sits in our coverage

Our coverage does not focus on shipping or energy fuels, as our core FX franchise centers on G10 currencies and rates. However, the oil price shock described is consistent with our broader view that supply disruptions in the Middle East could keep energy prices elevated through Q1 2026.

That said, we have not published firm-specific targets for companies in the shipping or alternative fuels space. The commentary from ING is purely sectoral and does not touch on FX or rates directly.

How other firms see it

ING is the primary source, arguing a bullish stance on LNG and methanol adoption. Their view is aligned with other energy desks that see near-term substitution effects, but contrary to some environmental groups that emphasize the limited emission reductions. - Barclays: Aligned with ING on the cost competitiveness angle, but notes that infrastructure constraints could cap LNG uptake. - Goldman Sachs: Contrary, arguing that the current shock is temporary and that long-term shipping fuel trends depend on regulation, not oil prices.

Market Implications

Energy shipping stocks and alternative fuel infrastructure companies could see near-term tailwinds. LNG suppliers and methanol producers may benefit, while traditional bunker fuel providers face headwinds. The impact on FX is indirect, via oil-exporting currencies (NOK, CAD) which may strengthen on higher oil prices.

From the original

The current oil price shock is making alternative fuels more cost competitive in the shipping sector. LNG benefits the most, becoming even more attractive compared to conventional bunker fuels. Methanol is also becoming more viable, strengthening the case for methanol-ready vesse

Related speeches

4 items
JPMORGAN GLOBAL RESEARCHJ.P. Morgan Global ResearchMar 20, 2026

Global Commodities: What are the Markets Missing?

The desk believes that the ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East are creating significant upward pressure on commodity prices, particularly in energy markets. Per the full note by J.P. Morgan, attacks on critical energy infrastructure have intensified, leading to a precarious situation for oil and gas supplies. This backdrop is compounded by emerging signs of demand destruction in Asia, where soaring product prices are beginning to impact consumption patterns. With the consensus target for oil prices at 1.075, traders should remain vigilant as these developments unfold.

JPMORGAN GLOBAL RESEARCHJ.P. Morgan Global ResearchMar 6, 2026

Global Commodities: Oil and Gas Rocked by Conflict

Lead — The desk is positioning for heightened volatility in energy markets following recent military actions involving Israel and the US against Iran, which have severely disrupted oil and gas flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Per the full note from J.P. Morgan, commercial traffic has plummeted, with production shut-ins anticipated in the Gulf, raising concerns about supply shortages. This geopolitical tension is likely to influence currency pairs tied to energy exports, particularly those involving the USD and CAD. Our consensus target reflects these dynamics, suggesting a cautious approach in the face of potential escalation.

ING THINKMay 5, 2026

The Commodities Feed: Middle East re-escalation pushes oil prices higher

Lead — The recent re-escalation of tensions in the Persian Gulf has led to a notable uptick in oil and gas prices, as traders begin to reassess the potential duration of supply disruptions from this critical region. Per the full note from ing-think, this geopolitical tension is prompting a market recalibration that could have significant implications for currency pairs sensitive to energy prices. With no high-impact events on the calendar in the next 30 days, traders should remain vigilant about the evolving situation in the Middle East and its impact on the broader market landscape.

JPMORGAN GLOBAL RESEARCHJ.P. Morgan Global ResearchMay 22, 2026

Global Commodities: What’s New?

The desk is observing structural changes in global commodities markets, particularly the elevated premiums for Asian LNG over European benchmarks and the sidelining of precious metals; the implications of ongoing negotiations between Iran and the US are central to this narrative. Per the full note [source], the elevated prices in Asian LNG reflect a supply-demand imbalance as markets adjust to geopolitical realities. Consensus among analysts appears to have shifted, and with no significant calendar events in the next 30 days, traders should be vigilant about shifts in commodity pricing and their potential spillover effects into currency markets.

More from ING THINK

5 items

FX Bank Forecast aggregates and synthesises central-bank commentary. Sentiment scoring and bank tagging are heuristic — verify against the original source before trading. We do not endorse third-party content.

FX BANK FORECAST · COVERAGE

Institutional FX coverage in your inbox

Aggregated year-end forecasts, scenario shifts, and curated analyst notes from eight institutional desks. No promotion.