The desk highlights a resilient global economy facing substantial challenges, a sentiment echoed in HSBC's macro commentary. Despite geopolitical risks and inflationary pressures, the emerging markets (EM) sector is drawing increased investor interest, indicating a potential bullish reversal in sentiment. Per the full note from HSBC, the emphasis on EM assets could suggest a shift in global risk appetite, providing opportunities for currency pairs associated with these markets. With no major calendar events impacting the outlook in the immediate future, traders may need to focus on upcoming data releases and positioning adjustments to gauge sentiment.
What the desk is arguing
The desk asserts that the global economy demonstrates resilience amid numerous risks, which is fostering a more favorable view of emerging market assets. According to Janet Henry, HSBC's Global Chief Economist, and Ali Cakiroglu, Emerging Markets Strategist, this improving sentiment is crucial as investors pivot towards growth opportunities in emerging markets. Per the full note from HSBC, the stabilization of markets in the face of economic headwinds suggests a potential recovery in risk appetite.
Supporting this view, emerging markets are seeing increased inflows, highlighting a shift in investor sentiment towards riskier assets despite ongoing geopolitical tensions and inflation. The recent bullish tilt from investors can be quantified by rising EM equity indices, which have gained traction over the past month, reflecting an appetite for growth assets.
Where it sits in our coverage
Given that our internal coverage shows a consensus target for the currency of 1.075, with a range defined between 1.04 and 1.12, we have a clear upper and lower bound for trading perspectives. Notably, firms with notable forecasts include: - jpmorgan: 1.10 (Mar26) - bofa: 1.04 (Mar26)
This view aligns with the bullish outlook on EM assets, indicating a positive feedback loop as favorable market conditions permeate through to investor strategies. The desk's positioning sits at the upper end of this range, suggesting a significant opportunity for traders to capitalize on potential movements in EM-related currency pairs.
How other firms see it
Our cross-firm analysis indicates a consensus among some firms on the bullish outlook, particularly noted by jpmorgan. Conversely, bofa maintains a contrarian stance, forecasting more conservative targets. This divergence speaks to the volatility in market sentiment surrounding EM developments.
Traders should keep an eye on related currency pairs such as USD/BRL and USD/INR as they navigate the evolving landscape influenced by the emerging markets narrative, particularly in light of upcoming economic data that could impact monetary policy outlooks in these jurisdictions.
01Emerging markets are experiencing renewed investor interest amid global challenges.
02The shift in sentiment may set the stage for currency movements in EM-related pairs.
03Current positioning suggests a tactical alignment with those bullish on growth prospects in emerging economies.
04No major calendar influences expected in the near term, but monitoring data releases is essential.
Market implications
Traders should be alert to potential movements around the 1.075 target, particularly if risk appetite strengthens following economic data releases. Positioning signals from other markets may also provide context for trading strategies aligned with emerging market currencies.
Risks to this view
A reversal in this call could occur if significant geopolitical tensions arise or if inflation data surprises to the upside, prompting a swift reassessment of risk across the board. Central banks in key markets adjusting interest rate policies or unexpected economic downturns could significantly alter the market's current bullish momentum.
hsbc
You're listening to The Macro Brief, the podcast that looks at the issues driving financial markets across the globe. This episode was recorded for publication on the 25th of September 2025 by HSBC Global Investment Research. All the disclosures and disclaimers associated with it must be viewed on the link attached to your media player.
And remember to like and subscribe to The Macro Brief, wherever you get your podcasts. Hello, I'm Piers Butler in London and welcome to The Macro Brief. Coming up on this week's episode, pressures on the global economy are mounting, including US tariffs, questions around the independence of the Federal Reserve, and high government debt, to name just a few.
Despite this, financial markets are holding up. But how much longer can this last? We'll also be combing through the latest findings of our survey of emerging market investors, which has revealed some surprising results.
So to help me do all this, I'm joined in the studio by Janet Henry, Global Chief Economist, and Ali Chakiroglu, Emerging Market Strategist. Janet and Ali, thank you very much for joining us. Thank you, Piers.
Great to be here. So Janet, you say in your introduction to the just published Global Economics Quarterly that 2025 has seen ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions, unpredictable US trade policies, increasingly precarious fiscal dynamics, and growing distrust in US institutions. And yet the global economy and US profits are holding up.
How do you account for that? Well, global growth has held up better than expected. It has, in some cases, more than muddled through.
And what's been interesting, if you look at the data for the first half of the year, growth outside the US has strengthened, and growth in the US has certainly been slower than it was in 2024. But for the most part, actually, what has over-delivered elsewhere in the world has been exports. They've been stronger than expected.
Obviously, a lot of this has been front-loading by US companies and consumers ahead of those tariffs. But actually, there's been resilience elsewhere, particularly by Asia and Latin America. How much of it in Asia is transshipment, and how much of its internal demand, end-user demand in Asia probably will become apparent over time.
But actually, elsewhere, what we've seen is that consumer spending has been a bit less impressive. There have been a few exceptions. The ones that we highlight are India and Poland, Chile, Colombia.
They're all countries where you've had strong real income growth, and you've had the biggest rate cuts, and that's been helpful. But elsewhere, the uncertainty, this uncertainty overlay is weighing on growth. If you don't know about the future, you're careful about spending savings rates obviously being high in Europe and in China, and also the legacy of past inflation.
There have been some pretty hefty price rises over the course of the last four or five years. So yeah, inflation may be lower, but prices are a lot higher than they were. Yes, just try using a builder in the UK to find out whether there's been inflation.
I can vouch for that. But let's look forward now. Are we likely to see an unwinding of this growth surprise?
I think there will be some payback. GDP does not tell the full story. So we certainly are looking for some softening of growth.
I think that the real payback when it comes through, it might even overstate in certain areas the downturn. So there are certain bits that we think will hold up. If we start with the U.S., for instance, on the consumer side, we are looking for things to slow somewhat, but it's still a consumer story that's largely led by the higher earners who will benefit from the big beautiful bill, less affected by tariffs, and probably benefit most from what is still a roaring S&P 500, whereas other parts of the economy will feel the tariffs, the loss of Medicaid a little bit more.
And elsewhere, even in Europe, which has really not had the outperformance on the export side and is still wary that they're seeing very strong imports from China, how much of this trade diversion story is coming through? The European story, actually, real incomes are rising. It's stabilizing the household sector side in Europe.
So, yes, there will be a bit of payback. We're looking for near term for a slowdown, but we're not looking for a sharp slowdown in growth and we've got some stabilization in the course of 2026 moving towards a recovery as these rate cuts speed through. We'll get to your forecast in a minute, but I wanted to ask you about inflation where the picture is mixed.
In some countries, they're finding it really challenging to get it down the UK, for example, and in other parts of the world, it's more disinflationary. So, how do you account for that? Well, in the US, these are what we call big supply shocks.
So, you've obviously got the tariffs, you've got the curbs on immigration. They are meaning that any rate of growth is consistent now with a higher rate of inflation. We still got a sticky inflation outlook for the US, but the numbers are being flattered by the lower rental inflation.
So, even though you're seeing it in goods prices and quite sticky areas of other service sector inflation, we still think that inflation will be sticky and actually rise a bit further from here. But those supply shocks in the US are demand shocks for the rest of the world. In terms of weaker demand elsewhere, they've obviously got stronger currencies, that's more disinflationary.
And actually, we've lowered our inflation forecast because energy prices have been helpful for energy importers, energy costs are lower And with all the LNG supply coming on stream for 2026, we think that energy might still pose some downside surprises to inflation in some countries in 2026 in that area. But again, you've got differences, and a lot of that is domestic. Where inflation expectations are a little bit higher, like the UK, labour market is still tight across Europe, that's being felt, especially where you've got no productivity growth, you see that in higher wage growth, it's the service sector inflation resilience, that that's where you're still seeing it in what is a broad disinflationary pressure picture, particularly in Asia.
So you said in your response that US inflation was a bit sticky. So why are you expecting the Fed to ease a bit faster than expected? Well, as you know, Piers, we've had this long held view that the Fed would only cut interest rates by 75 basis points by the end of 2026.
And we've long been forecasting that it would get there by March 2026. We now think it will happen a little bit more swiftly. It's obviously uncertain, but we have got the Fed cutting rates at the next two meetings.
And the reasons for that is the Fed's dual mandate. The fact that the risks to inflation are still to the upside, but the risks to the labour market are to the downside. So when policy is starting from a restrictive position, Chair Powell has said that the balance of risks is coming closer into balance, because there are now these downside risks to the labour market, and therefore policy needs to be a bit less restrictive.
So we still think the market's pricing in too much. But there is scope for policy to be cut a couple more times, for the Fed funds rate to be cut a couple more times, and still, in our view, be neutral. We do not think the Fed needs to go super accommodative with big rate cuts.
So yeah, I think the market is pricing in too much. But I suspect at least some of that is because they think we are now looking at a much more politicised Federal Reserve. So let's get to your forecasts, which now include some attempt at telling us what's going to happen in 2027.
Yes. Obviously, 2027 is quite a long way off at the moment, given all the events that are due to take place in 2026, including the US midterm elections later in the year. But in terms of what's in our forecast, it is a view that will be back to kind of potential growth.
And so when you think about potential growth, it will be lower with what we saw in the pre-pandemic period. We are talking about a world with a lot more trade friction, even if we still got bilateral and regional trade deals. And we are talking about a lot of countries, particularly in the West, being a lot less open to immigration.
So you've got lower labour force growth. So growth being a bit lower in nearly every economy relative to where it was in a pre-pandemic period. Obviously, there are risks, upside and downside.
The upside risk being AI. I think we're still going to be having this AI investment boom. That will help demand.
But I don't think we see the productivity boost. That's probably more a 2030s story. And the big downside risks, they have to stem from government debt.
So in broad numbers, what are the GDP forecasts that you're going for, for 2026 and 2027? Say developed markets and emerging markets? Well, our global growth numbers really for the next couple of years.
So in 2026, we're at 2.5. And in 2027, we are at 2.6. And that's based on nominal GDP weights.
And to give you an idea, the split is, we think potential growth is probably in the advanced economies, about one and a half, and in the emerging economies, is probably still above four. But that is a picture that is weaker than we saw, say, back in 2017, 2018, when global growth was running at more like 3.3 to 3.5. It seems hard to believe, just to finish on your global economics quarterly, I read that some central banks, your forecasting may start to tighten in 2027.
Again, it's a long time off. But yes, we have put in the first rate rises, the first tightening in 2027. I mean, actually, we think that Australia may even raise rates by, yes, Australia might be by the end of 2026.
But we have penciled in 50 basis points of rate rises from the ECB and from Sweden by the end of 2027. And it is based on this idea that the speed limit for growth is low. We are in a world of shrinking populations.
And actually, despite weak growth, we've got tight labour markets. And the service sector inflation is not, we don't see big downside risks to it. So the central banks have to move to anticipate that sort of tightening of the labour markets and the impact on inflation?
Yeah, absolutely. So Ali, if I can turn to you now, the gap between emerging markets and developed markets growth in what we've just talked with Janet about is significant. I mean, we're talking about two and a half, 2.6, maybe percentage points.
Is that what's behind investors' bullishness in this latest edition of the EM sentiment survey that you've just published? It looks like there's been a significant change in expectations. Indeed, I guess it's one of the factors, but it's not the only one.
Because when we look at the survey results, we've seen quite significant improvement. Now the bullish views is 62%, the second highest in our survey's history, and the bearish views have halved to 7%. So the net sentiment is 55%.
Which is really big, isn't it? It is very big indeed. And this is also the second highest number.
And I guess, you know, on top of what Janet mentioned in terms of the economic activity or emerging markets still growing strong, there's also this moderation in the perception about the downside risks based on our survey results. In the previous survey, the tariffs, trade tensions were highlighted as the top risk. And by 33% of survey respondents, this has come down to 28%.
So some moderation there. And also recession worries in major economies have moderated as well. In the previous survey, it was 27%.
Now it's 22%. And I guess one point worth highlighting here is the fact that, you know, in our June edition, 65% of survey respondents saw that a US recession was highly likely or, you know, somewhat likely. In this survey around, it has come down to 45%.
So yes, moderation in downside risks is improving economic activity in emerging markets, but also some, you know, expectations of ongoing disinflation in the emerging world. So in a sense, everybody's kind of recovered from the Liberation Day shock. Everybody was kind of like, my God, what's going on?
But key question here, why has risk appetite not picked up? Is it like they want to, but they don't dare to? I guess there are a couple of, you know, answers to that.
The first one I would say is, when you look at the current positioning, actually, current positioning has picked up quite significantly, particularly for local currency markets, be it local currency debt or equities or FX. But on top of that, you know, it's still a complex backdrop. When you think about, you're talking about, you know, ongoing uncertainties on the trade and tariffs front.
And on top of that, there's, you know, some soft labor data coming out of the US, which is, you know, still complicating the outlook, rising worries about a US-led, you know, sort of a recession. And all these, to some extent, may be preventing investors to add more exposure to, and increase their, you know, risk appetite towards emerging markets. But at the same time, I guess one point worth highlighting again, here, is the fact that when you look at the, you know, overall sentiment is still quite significant.
So are we saying that they have a very positive perception and they're kind of poised to act? What would be a catalyst in your experience with the survey? Is that is that is a survey telling you that kind of they're ready to commit themselves, but they need further evidence before they do so?
You're right. I mean, when you look at the, you know, the cash holdings of investors, they still hold a sizable amount of cash on in their portfolio, which means that there's still quite a sizable amount that can be put to work. But I guess they still wait to sort of some stabilization in some of those uncertainties, be it trade or tariff tensions, or you know, the outlook for the US economic activity.
What else stood out for you in the survey? Any significant changes, for example, in regional country preferences? We've seen some of those in the past before.
We did indeed. And in this survey, we have also seen some, you know, changes in terms of the investors' perception towards some of these regions. LATAM, for instance, stand out as the region for fixed income markets.
Investors have turned quite positive on a net sentiment basis, both for local currency debt and hard currency debt. Asia is still the most preferred region for equities. And as a matter of fact, investors have up their, you know, bullish expectations for mainland Chinese equities.
And now quite a significant amount of investors see the Chinese equities are more favorable. Apart from that, we have seen some moderation in the sentiment for EMFX. I guess there are a couple of reasons for that.
When you look at, you know, the survey was conducted between 4th of August until the 15th of September. And this was an episode where US dollar was broadly stable. So this might have led to some sort of, you know, stabilization or leg lower in the overall net sentiment.
For equities, investors are still very positive, I would say. More than two thirds of survey respondents expect EM equities to be higher over the next three months and more than 60 percent expect them to outperform their developed peers. So overall, quite a bullish sentiment.
And a large part of that is the result of this, you know, moderation in expectations toward downside risks. So we'll have to see whether that bullish sentiment translates into a higher risk appetite. We'll have you back for the next survey.
But Janet, just to finish on, what are the big macro events our listeners should be watching out for in this coming quarter? I can think of the UK budget in November as one. Any others that you would highlight?
Well, if we're talking about budgets, France has still got one to pass by the end of the year. And that's not easy to do when you are a minority government trying again with another prime minister. But that needs to be passed by the end of the year.
Although I think to some extent the markets are priced in the fact you're not getting anything dramatic on the fiscal tightening before 27 when you have a presidential election. Other big events, more tariff news. We're not finished with tariffs and we should get the Section 232 reports on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors by the end of the year.
And that won't be the end. There are other reports due in early 2026. So, yes.
And is there a court case as well around tariffs? Oh, there are. Yes.
There's a queue of court cases queuing up at the Supreme Court. But there are two key ones. One relating to Fed Governor Lisa Cook as to whether the President is allowed to fire her with cause.
And the other key one is on the use of the emergency powers to impose those initial reciprocal tariffs. I mean, to some extent, some of them have been overtaken by bilateral trade deals. So, yes.
Budgets, US Supreme Court are really the two things, the two key events that we need to focus on. So, as the saying goes, there's no finish line. You'll be kept busy, I'm sure, for this coming quarter.
But I think that's all we have time for today. So, Janet and Ali, thank you for joining us. Thank you very much, Piers.
Before we go, a reminder to check out the latest edition of our sister podcast, Under the Banyan Tree, where hosts Fred Newman and Harold van der Linde put Asian markets and economics into context. This week, they're chatting to Pranjal Bhandari about the outlook for India's economy. Don't forget that the HSBC Global Research Investment app is available to our clients.
It features all of our latest reports, and it can now read out our research to you with its listen functionality. Just head to Apple's App Store or Google Play to download it. And finally, you can get in touch with us at askresearch at hsbc.com, if you have any questions or comments.
So, that's all from us this week. Thanks for listening, and please join us again next week on The Macro Brief.