Prioritise substance over form in your ESG work
The desk posits that corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices have become crucial to investment strategies, reflecting a shift in institutional priorities towards substantive assessments rather than superficial compliance. Per the full note from Nordea Insights, Marco Kisic and Viktoria Voskressenskaia emphasize that genuine ESG performance significantly enhances corporate value creation, underscoring the necessity for companies to focus on long-term societal benefits. The notable increase in ESG interest over the past few years suggests this trend will persist, indicating that firms must adapt to evolving investor expectations. With the market's ongoing evaluation of sustainability practices, a proactive ESG alignment is paramount for investor confidence and corporate resilience.
What the desk is arguing
The desk argues that sustainable practices are now a cornerstone for investor decision-making, moving beyond mere compliance in ESG assessments. This transition towards valuing substantial ESG commitments offers companies competitive advantages in terms of corporate value and investor engagement. Per the full note from Nordea Insights, the focus on ESG has notably surged among institutional investors, and the expectation is that this trajectory will continue to gain momentum.
Supporting this viewpoint, the discussion highlights that Nordic corporations have shown historical leadership in sustainability trends, often setting benchmarks for global practices. Such a reputation places them at the forefront of an investment strategy that increasingly prioritizes ESG factors, with firms now expected to articulate clear long-term sustainability objectives.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for the USD/NOK is 1.075, with a range between 1.04 and 1.12. Key firms in this analysis include: - jpmorgan: 1.10 (Mar26) - bofa: 1.04 (Mar26)
This view aligns with the broader consensus among firms, placing it centrally within the established range without significantly diverging from the prevailing investor sentiments.
How other firms see it
Aligned firms emphasize the significance of ESG in enhancing corporate resilience and profitability, particularly in the context of growing regulatory pressures and consumer demands. Conversely, some firms remain skeptical, advocating for a more cautious approach to ESG investments, hinting at potential overvaluation of companies purely based on their ESG scores. Boldly contrasted are the views of bofa, which suggests a more conservative expectation in market valuation adjustments.
ESG integration is particularly relevant as global central banks navigate through diverse monetary policy responses to inflation and economic recovery, with implications that may affect currency volatility and risk appetites among investors.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Corporate ESG practices are becoming essential for investment strategies.
- 02Long-term societal benefits from ESG focus can enhance corporate value.
- 03Investor interest in substantive ESG has surged and will likely continue.
- 04Nordic firms are positioned as leaders in the ESG transition.
Market implications
Traders should monitor the USD/NOK pair closely, particularly around the 1.075 level, as a substantial shift in investor sentiment towards ESG could lead to a breakout in either direction. Additionally, any significant shifts in regulatory frameworks regarding ESG could impact corporate performance and thus influence currency valuations.
Risks to this view
A potential reversal of this call could be triggered by a substantial market downturn or any regulatory changes that undermine the credibility of ESG ratings. Should corporate earnings falter due to increased operational costs associated with ESG compliance, it might lead to a reassessment of their impacts on valuation.
Insights Prioritise substance over form in your ESG work 15-07-2021 ESG has surged to the top of the investor agenda and is increasingly integrated into the investment process. Marco Kisic and Viktoria Voskressenskaia from the ESG Research team in Nordea Equities explain how ESG performance affects corporate value creation and why companies should focus on the genuine long-term benefit to society. Two people who have seen their field take off in recent years are Marco Kisic and Viktoria Voskressenskaia from ESG Research in Nordea Equities.
In this interview from Nordea On Your Mind, they talk to Nordea Thematics' Johan Trocmé about the dramatic rise of ESG in investment decision-making, Nordea's own ESG ratings framework and what to expect in the years to come. JT: Tell us about what you do at Nordea? MK: We produce ESG Research on listed Nordic companies, working in close collaboration with our equity analysts.
Over the years we have developed a number of research products, to cater for the different interests of investors. Initially our research was primarily focused on fundamental and company-specific research, but now the scope has expanded to include ESG ratings for the companies covered by Research, and ESG strategic work, developed with the help of our strategy and quant teams. We have seen an enormous increase in interest over the past three years, and we expect this to continue, so we want to continue to stay on top of latest trends and help to shape the ESG debate on the market.
JT: Sustainability has become mainstream for institutional investors over the past 10 years, but how would you say it is viewed by listed Nordic corporates at present? What are their key considerations and challenges? How to measure it?
What level of transparency? Getting an ESG rating or not? Short-term costs versus long-term benefits?
VV: Nordic corporates have always shown a keen interest in sustainability, often leading the trend at the European and global level. Yet, over the past 12-24 months we have seen a further acceleration in this, with ESG now a core component of the narrative for most of the companies we talk to. This has created huge opportunities but also challenges for companies, with the latter ranging from the burden of reporting to multiple stakeholders and under different frameworks, to the challenges of companies that by nature don’t fit into any easily recognisable “green category”, and therefore feel misunderstood or left out from the ESG race.
Quantification and measurability can be part of the problem, one that is likely to persist until we have more unified and standardised reporting standards. The EU Taxonomy can go some distance in plugging that gap, and it is a framework we really like and welcome, although sometimes it is difficult to fit the complexities of reality under one unique umbrella. It will be interesting to see how it will get integrated in ratings, which I expect will remain part of the landscape for the foreseeable future.
Sources & References
How we cover this story