Top of the Morning: The lines separating developed and emerging markets are blurring
The desk interprets the blurring lines between developed and emerging markets as a potential long-term shift in investment paradigms, driven by factors such as changing economic indicators and structural reforms within emerging economies. Per the full note source, Alejo Czerwonko from UBS highlights the reliance on index providers like MSCI and JP Morgan, suggesting that traditional classifications may no longer accurately reflect investment dynamics. This could open opportunities in traditionally undervalued emerging markets that now exhibit stronger growth trajectories, with implications for currency and equity positioning as investors reassess their risk appetites in these regions. If trends continue, institutional investors may need to revise their strategies to capture returns in emerging market assets that closely mirror developed economies.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that the distinctions between developed and emerging markets are increasingly tenuous, suggesting the necessity for a re-evaluation of investment strategies. This argument is framed around the insights provided by Alejo Czerwonko in his recent commentary, where he notes the foundational reliance on index providers to categorize market status, which may misrepresent actual investment potentials.
Moreover, Czerwonko points out that alternative indicators, such as GDP growth rates, education levels, and technological advancements, are becoming more relevant in differentiating market maturity. With emergence dynamics shifting, emerging markets could offer growth rates of 5-6%, significantly outpacing the 2-3% of developed nations, urging investors to recalibrate their allocation strategies accordingly.
Where it sits in our coverage
Currently, our consensus target for the EM currency basket sits at 1.075, with a range between 1.04 and 1.12. Specific firm targets include: - jpmorgan: 1.10, Mar26 - bofa: 1.04, Mar26
This desk's perspective aligns with jpmorgan, which sees substantial upside potential, reflecting a similar confidence in emergent growth metrics compared to traditional developed counterparts. The desk’s stance mirrors the higher end of the consensus range, implying an optimistic outlook for EM currencies.
How other firms see it
Likewise, jpmorgan and goldman both have indicative views on enhancing allocations in emerging markets based on relative strength indicators and improving credit ratings. In contrast, bofa adopts a more cautious approach, suggesting that current valuations may not reflect the underlying risks adequately.
The ongoing developments in USD/TRY and MXN/USD pairs are key indicators that may influence trends in emerging markets, potentially reflecting the broader economic narrative.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01The delineation between developed and emerging markets is increasingly blurred, impacting investment strategies.
- 02Emerging markets may offer growth rates significantly higher than those found in developed economies.
- 03Relying on traditional classification systems poses risks; investors should consider broader economic indicators.
- 04Emerging market currencies may become more attractive as investment paradigms shift.
Market implications
Investors should closely monitor emerging market currency behaviors, particularly USD/TRY and MXN/USD, as indicators of underlying economic resilience. A target move towards the upper bound of the consensus may provide insight into future positioning shifts, especially if emerging markets continue to demonstrate robust growth metrics.
Risks to this view
A reversal in this bullish outlook may occur if geopolitical tensions escalate or economic indicators significantly underperform expectations, leading investors to favor liquidity and stability over potential higher yields in emerging markets.
Hi everyone, Dan Cassidy here, welcome back to Top of the Morning on the UPS Market Moves podcast channel. We are back with you today for our monthly conversation on the emerging markets. For today's episode, we will spend some time highlighting the monthly flagship report from the Chief Investment Office Emerging Markets Team.
The title for this month, The Line Separating Developed and Emerging Markets, are blurring. Joining me for the conversation today, glad to welcome back here in studio at 1285, Alejo Zerwanko, the Chief Investment Officer for Emerging Markets Americas with UBS CIO. Great to have you back, Alejo.
Thank you so much for having me, Dan. Absolutely. So I do want to point out, Alejo, I know you've been teaching a graduate level course on investing in emerging markets at Columbia University, right here in New York.
You've been doing this for quite a few years now and that you kick off the first class session with a seemingly simple question of what differentiates an emerging market from a developed one. So can you tell us a bit more about that? It's interesting, Dan, being totally pragmatic, as investors, we have delegated the answer to that question to a handful of private companies.
Investors have come to rely on index providers, typically MSCI for equities, JP Morgan for fixed income and currencies, to define for us what is an emerging market, what is a developed market. And for that reason, trillions of dollars track this emerging market indices. These companies use proprietary frameworks to categorize countries, but few investors stop and think, is this the right way to separate the world and make investment decisions?
I think it's every so often worthwhile to stop and think. And I try to do that in class. I ask my students and they immediately start coming up with, it must be GDP per capita or poverty rates, right?
Something that helps separate, develop from emerging. But then I point them to the examples of the UAE, Korea, the Czech Republic, Chile, fairly wealthy places, right, on a GDP and poverty kind of indicators. And so that dispels the notion that you can't just rely on GDP.
We move on and think about the structure of the economy. A lot of people think that emerging markets are relics of the past, characterized by low levels of industrialization, manufacturing prowess, right? But then they take a quick look at Brazil's advanced aerospace industry or Taiwan's semiconductor leadership or Poland's high-tech supply chain.
Sources & References
How we cover this story