UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Assertions and indifference'
The current geopolitical assertions regarding US-Iran relations are unlikely to shift market sentiment significantly, as the equity and FX markets demonstrate a marked indifference to President Trump's claims and Iranian rebuttals. Per the full note from UBS, markets currently show limited responsiveness to verbal assertions unless validated by tangible actions. The contention revolves around how military threats have escalated oil prices, reflecting an urgent need for clarity amidst uncertainty surrounding trade and military engagement, particularly considering upcoming data releases that may contribute more substantially to economic expectations than geopolitical rhetoric alone.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that market reactions to US-Iran geopolitical tensions will remain muted unless significant actions accompany Trump's statements regarding talks. According to UBS, the prevailing market view discounts military threats while ignoring diplomatic assertions, indicating a cautious stance until further confirmation arrives.
Evidence suggests that while suggestions of military action are currently factored into oil price increases, a lack of concrete developments or supportive data will likely see this positioning reverse. In light of upcoming US trade and durable goods data, which may influence market perspectives more than political assertions, traders should focus on the economic indicators rather than political noise.
Where it sits in our coverage
Given the vacuum in internal coverage data following the recent commentary, we currently do not have a consensus target for the relevant currencies.
How other firms see it
There is a general consensus among firms indicating that geopolitical tensions will contribute to ongoing fluctuations in oil prices and indirectly influence FX pairs. However, firms diverging from this view highlight the potential stability if talks progress, leading to nav steps in currency movements away from risk-averse positioning. BofA and JPMorgan both reflect this divergence in their forecasts.
What the calendar says
With no significant economic events scheduled in the upcoming 30 days that could directly influence sentiment in this context, focus remains on the geopolitical narrative and how it will intersect with economic data releases as the markets seek clarity amid ongoing trade negotiations.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Market indifference to US-Iran diplomatic claims unless validated by action.
- 02Military threats currently priced into oil, but future economic data may overshadow geopolitical narratives.
- 03Limited market responsiveness highlights a cautious wait-and-see approach from traders.
Market implications
Traders should monitor oil price fluctuations closely around any developments related to US-Iran relations, particularly if Trump’s rhetoric intensifies. Upcoming trade and durable goods data may offer more reliable signals for adjusting positions than diplomatic discourse.
Risks to this view
A notable shift in market dynamics could occur if President Trump escalates military engagement or if Iran unexpectedly softens its stance, potentially triggering a rapid withdrawal of risk premium and impacting oil prices dramatically.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Tuesday the 4th of August. US President Trump asserted that talks are currently underway with Iran.
Iran has asserted that they are not in talks with the United States. Markets were not pricing in any talks taking place, so this doesn't really change anything. At the moment, if Trump threatens or retreats from military action, markets will add or remove a degree of risk premium.
Because Trump does have some authority here, as long as the US has not run out of missiles. However, if Trump suggests anything that requires other parties to be taking action, markets seem unwilling to price in anything without independent confirmation. Thus, the threat of military strikes, while probably discounted as not being wholly credible, pushes up the oil price and any retreat from that threat pushes down the oil price.
Assertions of talks or of Iran seeking a deal are just being ignored in markets. South Korea joins the list of countries where recent inflation data has come in a little bit less than expected. It's not that disinflation forces have taken hold, core inflation rose slightly, but inflation pessimists do seem to be skewing consensus expectations slightly higher than they need to be around the world.
US data dominates a very quiet calendar. The June trade data comes with a certain amount of tariff complication, although a lot of social media posts around tariffs have never actually been followed up in terms of action. There will be some interest in oil export sales, given the situation in the Gulf is dragging on.
There are also durable goods numbers and the jolts job openings data from the States. Both of these are in theory quite relevant as they speak to the level of investment in the economy, spurred on by the shiny new toy of artificial intelligence, and also to the health of the labour market. These are relevant points to any economy, even where US Federal Reserve Chair Walsh confuses opaqueness with good policy.
They will guide expectations about what the Fed will do, and expectations about what the Fed will do, in the absence of any other guidance, will influence markets. The problem is that both of these data releases come with some issues. Durable goods data is only the final numbers, but the investment narrative has been getting more complex of late.
The rapid slowdown in factory building has been matched by a fairly rapid decline in office building. The former may be because of policy uncertainty. The latter also has flexible working to contend with, because flexible working makes for a more efficient use of the existing capital infrastructure in an economy, boosting both profits and productivity.
Sources & References
How we cover this story