UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Deadlines challenge the optimism bias'
The desk is positioning for heightened volatility in the FX markets, driven by geopolitical tensions surrounding the U.S.-Iran relationship, as emphasized by Paul Donovan from UBS. The current state of uncertainty includes potential disruptions to critical infrastructure, particularly water and energy resources in the Gulf region, which may elevate oil prices and impact the broader market sentiment. Per the full note from UBS, the optimism bias in financial markets has kept price movements subdued despite these risks, noting that destructive actions could lead to extended periods of elevated oil prices beyond current market expectations. With consensus targets around 1.075 and no immediate high-impact calendar events, traders should remain attentive to potential shifts in risk sentiment caused by unfolding geopolitical developments.
What the desk is arguing
The desk is highlighting the tension surrounding U.S. deadlines related to Iran, which could pose significant risks to regional infrastructure, including vital desalination and oil facilities. As articulated by Paul Donovan, any escalation could have severe implications for water and energy supply, thereby heightening inflationary pressures through increased oil prices.
The potential impact on oil infrastructure is critical, as Donovan notes, citing the significant reliance of Gulf states on desalination for drinking water. A deteriorating geopolitical landscape may lead to a correction in the current market optimism given that financial markets often experience a delay in pricing in geopolitical risks.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for the relevant currency pair is 1.075, with a range of 1.04 to 1.12 as projected by various firms: - jpmorgan: 1.10 (Mar26) - bofa: 1.04 (Mar26)
Given the heightened geopolitical risks, the desk's view aligns more closely with jpmorgan’s forecast, suggesting potential for an upward movement in prices if tensions escalate further, which sits at the upper bound of the current spread.
How other firms see it
Firms like jpmorgan share a common cautious outlook reflecting concerns over geopolitical risks, while bofa maintains a more pessimistic viewpoint for the near term. This divergence indicates a market split on how the geopolitical landscape might unfold.
Traders should continue monitoring the USD/JPY pair for possible spillover effects as market sentiment shifts in response to geopolitical developments, particularly around U.S.-Iran relations and any resultant changes in energy prices.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran and the U.S. remain high, influencing oil prices and FX markets.
- 02The current market optimism may be mispriced in light of potential infrastructure damage in the Gulf.
- 03UBS highlights significant over-reliance on desalination in Gulf states, which could exacerbate regional tensions.
- 04Traders should remain alert to volatility spikes driven by developments in the U.S.-Iran situation.
Market implications
Watch for price movements near the 1.075 mark, as fluctuations in risk sentiment could trigger breaks above this level. The developments out of the U.S.-Iran negotiations should be monitored closely as any escalation may prompt a significant shift in positions.
Risks to this view
Should diplomatic solutions emerge or if the U.S. chooses to ease its position on sanctions, we could see a swift reversal in market sentiment and potentially a strengthening of the USD against other currencies, counteracting the current bearish outlook.
Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Tuesday the 7th of April.
Financial markets concern with US President Trump's deadline to Iran is how much damage would be done to the infrastructure of the region in any escalation of the conflict. Attacks on civilian infrastructure are in defiance of the Geneva Conventions, but legal niceties play a subordinate role to the realities of existence if the US or Iran strike desalination plants. In some Gulf states, over half the drinking water comes from desalination.
Damage to oil infrastructure, either in US strikes or Iranian retaliation, threatens to extend higher oil prices well beyond the point at which Iran allows the Strait of Hormuz to reopen. Infrastructure outside the region is also relevant here. Ukraine has continued to attack Russian oil infrastructure to mitigate Russia's revenue boost from higher oil prices and the US easing of oil sanctions.
For now, the optimism bias in financial markets, combined with the broader experience of the US failing to stick to its own deadlines in various policy areas, has kept price action in markets fairly limited. The United Kingdom holds a meeting of over 40 nations today to discuss safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz once hostilities end. The United States is not part of this group, which is a mixture of European, Asian and Middle Eastern countries.
This is not something that markets are going to pay too much attention to in the short term, as, clearly, hostilities have not come to an end. But in the longer term, this may be important in several ways. Lowering insurance costs for shipping freight, increasing the volume of freight through the Strait more quickly, and raising possible questions about the fiscal cost of additional defence responsibilities.
This group does not necessarily preclude Iran tolling shipping passing through the Strait, as part of the process is diplomatic negotiations with Iran. There are various business sentiment opinion polls due today of limited real-world application. The New York Fed's one-year inflation expectations survey may get attention.
This has not shown the extremes of the Michigan inflation expectations poll, which is bitterly and absurdly divided along party political lines. The data matters because there is a fetishisation of inflation expectations, and market traders, half remembering the economic theory that they studied decades ago, therefore think the numbers matter. The reality is that inflation expectations will be driven by high-frequency purchases, so the soaring cost of gasoline in the States is going to add to these numbers.
Sources & References
How we cover this story