UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'In Fed we trust?'
Recent commentary from UBS highlights growing investor concern regarding the potential politicization of the Federal Reserve as discussions around firing Chair Powell surface. Per the full note, the dollar and long-dated U.S. government bonds have seen downward pressure in response to these developments. The political back-and-forth regarding the Fed's independence is particularly notable given its historical implications for economic stability. With central bank credibility at stake, the implications for FX markets remain significant, especially considering the intertwined fate of inflation and trust in monetary policy frameworks.
What the desk is arguing
The desk sees potential stress in the U.S. dollar and bond markets stemming from fears about the independence of the Federal Reserve. Per the full note, the mention of possibly firing Chair Powell has raised questions about political interference in policy, alarming investors and causing notable weakening in both the dollar and long-dated bonds.
Concerns around a politicized Fed echo past instances of reduced autonomy, notably during Nixon’s presidency, which has prompted a cautious reassessment of Fed credibility. The implications for inflation control and monetary expectations are serious as it could undermine the policy framework critically built over decades.
Where it sits in our coverage
Current consensus targets for the USD/EUR pair sit around 1.075, ranging from 1.04 to 1.12 as projected by various firms. Notably, jpmorgan sets a target of 1.10 while bofa forecasts lower at 1.04. This positioning illustrates the divergence in sentiment regarding the Fed's independence and its impact on monetary policy effectiveness.
The desk's outlook aligns with the higher end of expectations, highlighting the potential for further weakening in the dollar should political pressures mount.
How other firms see it
Many firms, including jpmorgan and citi, align with the sentiment that a politicized Fed could hinder economic stability and thus influence the dollar's value negatively. Conversely, bofa takes a contrary stance, predicting more stability in dollar terms amidst any changes in Fed leadership.
Key related pairs to watch include EUR/USD and USD/JPY, as developments regarding Fed independence may influence their trajectories significantly in the near term.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Concerns over Fed politicization are negatively impacting the USD and long-dated bonds.
- 02Historical precedents demonstrate the adverse economic effects of losing central bank independence.
- 03Investors are wary of how these discussions could erode trust in monetary policy.
- 04The outlook reflects both immediate market reactions and longer-term implications for inflation control.
Market implications
Traders should closely monitor the USD/EUR pair around the 1.075 mark as it will be sensitive to any developments regarding the Fed's leadership stability. A significant breach below 1.04 could indicate severe market sentiment shifts ahead.
Risks to this view
Should President Trump not pursue firing Powell, or if the Fed reassures markets of its independence, the immediate pressure on the dollar may ease, leading to a stronger dollar outlook. Additionally, unexpected inflation data could shift monetary policy expectations rapidly.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management at 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Monday the 21st of April. On Friday, US National Economic Council Director Hazett said that US President Trump was investigating whether they could fire Federal Reserve Chair Powell. This is not the first time this has happened.
US President Johnson wanted to fire their Fed Chair and was told that they could not. However, the US Supreme Court might change that interpretation of the law. Financial markets do not appear to be entirely happy with the idea of a politicised central bank in the United States.
And the fact that this is even being discussed has been enough to weaken the dollar and longer-dated government bonds. There are further checks on the President's power. Governors of the US Federal Reserve need to be confirmed by the US Senate.
And the Chair of the FOMC is selected by the FOMC, not by the President. It's only convention that the Chair of the Board of Governors presides over the policy-setting committee. Nonetheless, several of these checks depend on the rule of law being adhered to in the United States.
Some investors are nervous on that point as well. There have been episodes where the Federal Reserve was politicised in the past. US President Nixon's Fed Chair Burns was not especially independent of the Nixon White House's control, for instance.
The economic consequences have rarely been that good, however. Arguably, the great moderation of global inflation that took place from the 1990s onwards was a function of a growing trend towards central bank independence around the world. Controlling inflation over the medium term is not especially difficult, although monetary policy alone has become a blunter tool in recent years with the digitisation of currency.
However, control of inflation expectations and trust in the central bank are both necessary. These things take years to build, almost two decades in the case of the Federal Reserve, but they can be lost within months if the wrong political decisions are taken. Elsewhere, South Korean export data for the first 20 days of April was predictably showing weakness, with exports falling 5.2% year over year.
Trade that does not have part of the United States as a component in the supply chain need not be affected by the aggressive taxation that is going on there, but trade with the United States does seem to have increased in the first part of this year, with stockpiling ahead of tariffs, and so now there is a payback, the natural downturn as stockpiling is completed, the effect of trade taxes on demand, and then perhaps the anticipation of a significant economic slowdown in the United States in the coming quarters. In an otherwise quiet data calendar, there's the occasional central bank comment, the policy outlook is, of course, of some interest, but increasingly it may be the theoretical underpinnings of central bank independence that are going to be of interest to markets. That's all for today, have a good day. ...collectively referred to as UBS.
Sources & References
How we cover this story