UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Magic numbers'
The desk interprets recent Chinese economic data as indicative of ongoing domestic difficulties, particularly in retail and investment sectors, while external demand supports industrial production. Per the full note from UBS, retail sales underperformed and domestic investment fell more than expected, suggesting a lack of confidence among consumers. With the US 10-year Treasury yield now above 5%, this round number may have political ramifications, although economically it lacks significance. Overall, developments in China might impact market sentiment toward the USD/CNY pair, which is currently under scrutiny as traders assess geopolitical influences and economic fundamentals.
What the desk is arguing
The prevailing view among traders is that China's domestic economy continues to struggle, with retail and investment metrics highlighting these challenges. According to UBS's Paul Donovan, retail sales growth has significantly slowed, and investment has dropped sharply. This reflects broader concerns about consumer confidence as unemployment dynamics affect spending, which may further suppress economic growth.
Donovan’s commentary underscores that while industrial production shows improvement, this is primarily driven by external demand rather than domestic strength, complicating the recovery narrative. The market's focus on potential US Treasury yield levels intensifies amid China’s economic issues, with 5% becoming a psychological threshold in political discussions.
Where it sits in our coverage
As per our existing consensus target, we are aligned with a projected USD/CNY target of 1.075, which falls within the range of expectations from various firms: - jpmorgan with a target of 1.10 for March 2026. - bofa positioning at 1.04 for the same period.
This aligns closely with firmId's sentiment, as our forecast sits in the middle of the spread, indicating a balanced view amid differing opinions on the currency pair's exposure to domestic Chinese data.
How other firms see it
Overall, sentiment among aligned firms such as jpmorgan suggests a cautious outlook on the USD/CNY, with expectations supporting a gradual appreciation. In contrast, bofa presents a more pessimistic view, anticipating further weakening in the yuan.
Traders should monitor the USD/CNY movements closely as developments in the US Federal Reserve’s approach to inflation could parallel shifts in Chinese economic stability, particularly around potential stimulus measures that could influence market dynamics.
What the calendar says
No high-impact events are scheduled in the next 30 days that would directly affect this analysis, leaving traders to rely on ongoing geopolitical and economic developments for influence.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01China's economic indicators show sustained domestic weakness, particularly in retail and investment sectors.
- 02External demand is propping up industrial production, highlighting dependency on foreign markets.
- 03The 5% threshold in US Treasury yields could have political but not necessarily economic implications.
- 04The USD/CNY pair remains a key focus amid mixed signals from both Chinese data and US political discourse.
Market implications
Traders should keep a close eye on USD/CNY as it may respond to further domestic economic metrics from China, particularly any announcements surrounding possible stimulus measures. Additionally, any shifts in US Treasury yield sentiment might trigger movements against the backdrop of current market tensions.
Risks to this view
A stronger-than-anticipated fiscal stimulus from China could revive domestic confidence and improve retail spending, reversing the prevailing economic outlook. Conversely, if US Treasury yields drop significantly, this could undermine the current narrative and lead to a more favorable view on USD liquidity.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning, London time, on Tuesday the 15th of September. China's data overnight emphasised yet again the extremely lacklustre nature of the domestic economy.
Retail sales were growing, but without the resilience that's been seen in developed economies. Unemployment in the economy fell by more than expected. The picture is not exactly one of domestic confidence.
Industrial production did improve, but this is not really a domestic indicator per se. It's more likely reflecting the strength of international demand and China's ability to help US customers avoid tariffs through careful supply chain management. Unemployment ticked up on the official data, but that's only a part of the overall picture.
Fear of unemployment is one very critical possible reason for the domestic constraint in spending. While markets are keen to speculate on potential future stimulus packages, it's worth noting that the forms of stimulus that supported the economy in the past are not likely to succeed, at least succeed as well, in the current crisis. Novelty is perhaps necessary.
Meanwhile in the United States, financial headline writers are being driven to a frenzy of sensationalism as the US 10-year Treasury yield has risen above 5%. Economically, this is a non-event in as much as the economic consequences of a 4.9% yield – a little different to the consequences of a 5.0% yield. Politically, this has more weight. 5% is a round number, easily bandied about in political debate.
The rise of yields in defiance of US Treasury Secretary House Besant's actions is also relevant here. From any long-term perspective, this isn't an especially alarming bond yield. 5% may be a little elevated, but it's in an acceptable economic range when considering an economy with the US's trend nominal rate of GDP growth. The level is, of course, not so much the concern as the direction of travel, which is why the Fed's credibility matters.
Disorderly markets are to be avoided at all costs. And some sign of fiscal coherence would also, of course, be welcome. Besant probably understands the need for the latter, but the politics of the current environment don't really allow for that to be articulated, far less implemented.
UK labour market data for August was about as dull as economic data can be, and of course economic data is almost never dull. The figures came out in line with expectations, broadly speaking. Unemployment is holding steady and, of relevance to policy setting, there is a stable and unthreatening level of earnings growth.
This certainly doesn't herald any kind of wage-price spiral, and the absence of second-round inflation effects, in spite of six months of war, is to be welcomed. Elsewhere, we have the German ZDW economic survey. Survey evidence has had to play catch-up with the real economy of late, and German real-world data has been showing some quite reasonable performance, even before the normal upward revisions.
The US offers the Empire State manufacturing sentiment poll, but this can have no bearing on the prospects for policy at tomorrow's Federal Reserve meeting. One can and indeed should criticise US Federal Reserve Chair Walsh's attempts at leadership, but things are not so bad that a single sentiment survey is going to be seen as counting for anything. That's all for today, have a good day.
UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA-SIPC. The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research.
This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS.
Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story