UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Rise and fall'
The desk views the recent Iran-US peace deal as a critical factor likely to underpin risk markets and ease upward pressure on oil prices. Per the full note from UBS, the announcement suggests a stabilization in the geopolitical landscape, contributing to a temporary decline in oil prices before strategic petroleum reserves are depleted. This dynamic particularly favors riskier assets, while the impact of potential infrastructure damage in the region remains uncertain and could complicate forecasts. As we analyze this, we find no immediate high-impact events that could disrupt this narrative in the near term.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that the Iran-US agreement, set to be formally signed soon, will provide a substantial boost to risk markets, as highlighted in the UBS commentary. This deal facilitates a moderate decline in oil prices and suggests a rebound in investor sentiment, shifting trading behaviors toward riskier assets.
UBS notes that the immediate economic damage from potential disruptions in oil supplies has been mitigated, particularly since the deal came before strategic reserves were exhausted. Furthermore, even though prices have dipped, expectations for a full return to pre-war levels are tempered by uncertainties regarding infrastructure and regional stability.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for relevant markets is set at 1.075, spanning a range of 1.04 to 1.12. Key firms in our analysis include: - jpmorgan: Targeting 1.10 by March 2026 - bofa: Targeting 1.04 by March 2026
This positioning aligns with the broader sentiment in the market, with the desk's view toward an upward trend fitting comfortably within this spread. Notably, the desk’s perspective suggests a potential reconciliation with cautious projections from bofa, who hold a more conservative outlook at the lower bound of this range.
How other firms see it
Firms such as jpmorgan align with our bullish thesis, favoring the risk-on environment anticipated from the Iran-US deal. Conversely, bofa expresses caution, suggesting that the potential recovery in oil prices might not be as swift or durable as optimistic forecasts imply.
This thematic pivot also influences other currency pairs, particularly the USD/JPY trajectory that will likely mirror shifts in risk sentiment driven by geopolitical developments. Additionally, the interplay with emerging market currencies could be interesting as they react to this easing of geopolitical tensions.
What the calendar says
No significant events are on the calendar in the upcoming weeks that might precipitate a shift from this narrative. Traders should maintain vigilance on geopolitical updates from the region to calibrate positions effectively.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01The Iran-US peace deal is expected to support risk assets and lower oil prices.
- 02Market sentiment has turned optimistic despite underlying geopolitical risks.
- 03The shift in oil pricing dynamics could influence broader risk assets in currency pairs.
- 04No immediate high-impact calendar events are expected.
Market implications
Traders should focus on levels around 1.075, the consensus target, and watch for any shifts in sentiment influenced by further developments related to the Iran-US deal. Observing USD/JPY and other emerging market currencies may reveal trends connected to risk appetite.
Risks to this view
The primary risk to this outlook is a sudden deterioration in regional stability or unexpected economic consequences, particularly if the anticipated recovery in oil infrastructure is delayed or more severe damage is confirmed. Surprises in the broader geopolitical landscape could also shift market sentiment dramatically.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 6.30 in the morning London time on Monday the 15th of June. Confirmation by Iran that the United States has agreed to terms of a peace deal has allowed risk markets to rally and lower the oil price.
The deal came before strategic petroleum reserves had been exhausted and while China was still operating with fewer oil imports than normal. The tendency of investors to look on the bright side means that discrepancies in the Iranian and US positions are currently being overlooked. Iran is not tolling shipping travelling through the Strait of Hormuz for the next 60 days.
What happens next is not clear, but tolls were never likely to be a major economic cost. Shipping retention is now likely to shift, slowly, to what happens next. The immediate impact on oil prices has been a moderate decline, but pre-war oil prices are not likely to be re-seen for some considerable time.
The Strait of Hormuz will open slowly and ships may not be wildly keen to pass through, nor may their insurers, at least in the early stages of the peace agreement. Moreover, the extent of damage to infrastructure in the region is not really known at this stage. Gulf economies may have had an incentive to exaggerate some aspects of the damage to oil infrastructure as a mechanism to apply pressure to end the war.
But because taking so much as a selfie in front of a damaged Dubai building puts someone at risk of arrest, it's hard to form an assessment. Nonetheless, the inflation impulse from oil should fade quickly, and as there were no second round inflation effects, we go back to the underlying situation, which is and always has been fairly benign inflation pressures. The timing of the peace deal rather emphasises just how wrong the ECB's recent policy error has been.
No doubt the ECB's Nagel, who is speaking today, will suggest that the war's ending is a reason to be raising interest rates still further. The Teutonic cry of, we must have discipline, is still echoing around the ECB. War has led to a rise in Iranian status and a decline in US status within the region.
This has economic relevance when considering, in particular, regional fiscal policy. Gulf economies have had to spend to support their economies. They will have to spend to finance whatever reconstruction is required.
And Iran's status and the experience of the last few months means that there will also need to be rearmament. The question is where this fiscal spending is likely to be directed. Defence spending has never been exclusively directed towards the United States.
But there is at least an increased chance that the share allocated to US military equipment is now reduced. Construction spending is naturally skewed away from the United States as well. India provides Saudi metal supplies far more than does the United States, for example.
There is a reasonable chance that petrodollars and sovereign wealth fund money will be taken out of dollars to be spent in other currencies. Markets are likely to spend the day going over scenarios for the Gulf. The data calendar is not offering much of a distraction to that process.
The US Empire Manufacturing Survey is rendered even more than usually useless by the changing news cycle. German wholesale prices are of some slight interest, but it isn't normally a market-moving statistic. That's all for today.
Have a good day. Thank you very much for joining us today. This material is for your information only.
And it is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS.
Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story