UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Tax attacks'
The desk interprets the recent commentary from UBS as a critical perspective on the potential recession risks stemming from President Trump's aggressive trade policies and military aid suspension. Per the full note, these measures may weaken consumer sentiment and disturb established supply chains, particularly in sectors dependent on cross-border transactions. Notably, the U.S. economy, which started from a position of strength, could face headwinds if tariffs on everyday goods begin to dampen spending. This shift could place upward pressure on inflation and challenge the Federal Reserve's current outlook.
What the desk is arguing
The desk frames this as a potentially significant turning point for the U.S. economy due to increased recession risks following President Trump's recent actions. By suspending military aid to Ukraine and implementing hefty tariffs on imports from key trading partners, it is likely to destabilize consumer confidence and wage growth, essential pillars of the economic recovery.
Evidence from UBS highlights that the tariffs not only affect imports but also threaten complex supply chains in industries like automotive manufacturing, where products are frequently purchased across borders. These direct tax attacks on living standards could erode discretionary spending, which, according to UBS, would inevitably lead to a slowdown in economic growth.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our current consensus target for USD/CAD is 1.075, with a range between 1.04 and 1.12. Notable firm forecasts include: - jpmorgan: 1.10 (Mar26) - bofa: 1.04 (Mar26)
This view aligns with jpmorgan, suggesting a consensus on the potential for a weaker USD against the CAD if recession fears materialize, while bofa's more bearish stance reflects concerns about the immediate impact of tariffs and the resulting increase in inflationary pressures.
How other firms see it
Firms like jpmorgan and citi share a similar bearish outlook on the U.S. economy, suggesting potential risks associated with ongoing trade tensions. In contrast, bofa offers a more cautious perspective, indicating that current measures might not add significant downward pressure to the dollar yet.
Watch USD/CAD closely for volatility reflecting these changing dynamics, particularly as consumers react to higher prices and potential inflation driven by trade policies.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Trump's tariffs could have widespread implications for consumer prices and economic growth.
- 02Heightened risk of U.S. recession due to aggressive trade policies.
- 03Increased inflationary pressures may challenge the Federal Reserve's outlook.
- 04Visibility of price increases may damage consumer sentiment significantly.
Market implications
Traders should keep an eye on critical thresholds around 1.075 for USD/CAD and watch for signals of consumer sentiment shifts as tariffs take effect. Any significant changes in inflation data or Fed commentary could further influence this outlook.
Risks to this view
Should there be a substantial diplomatic resolution regarding trade or an easing of tariff measures, sentiment could quickly reverse, supporting a stronger dollar. Additionally, if consumer resilience remains high despite tariffs, the recession narrative may be invalidated.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Tuesday the 4th of March. US President Trump lashed out in several directions yesterday, suspending military aid to Ukraine and imposing significant taxes on US consumers of imports from China, Mexico and Canada.
These combined effects increase recession risks in the United States, although it is worth remembering that Trump inherited a strong US economy, and that starting point means that while weaker growth does seem inevitable, another Trump recession is not. The Ukraine position has economic consequences both in terms of potential increases in spending by European governments, and also potentially firming hostility to Russia and the United States internationally. This could result in more sanctions against Russia and less willingness to accommodate US demands on trade.
Trump addresses Congress, or at least some members of Congress, tonight. The trade taxes are direct attacks on US living standards. This had not expected to the Canadian and Mexican measures, in part because Trump was so quick to retreat earlier in the year, and in part because the pain of these taxes will be visible and potentially exaggerated to US consumers.
Canada and Mexico export goods to the United States that are high-frequency purchases. Complex supply chains like the auto sector are severely damaged if these taxes are applied to every single cross-border transaction. Tesla, the company owned by Trump megadonor Musk, is less affected than its competitors.
The visibility means that even if there is a subsequent retreat from these taxes, there will be economic damage. Consumers will be more aware of how tariffs work, and even short-lived increases in price will damage sentiment. The taxes on US consumers may provoke second-round inflation waves.
These include US companies raising prices because they choose to go for profits rather than market share. In addition, retailers may pursue profit-led inflation because the tariffs are on very visible products. Consumers expect price increases, although the degree that price increases are expected may vary according to which television channel consumers tune into.
A 25% trade tax on a finished consumer product should only increase the consumer price by 10% because of where the taxes are applied in the supply chain, but if the narrative focuses on the 25% tax, not the 10% consequence, consumers will expect 25% consumer price increases, making it easier for retailers to raise prices further. Both China and Canada have announced taxes on their own consumers in response to US tariffs. Canada runs a trade deficit with the US, excluding energy, so there will be some consequence from that.
However, it is non-tariff barriers that may pose a greater threat. The Premier of Ontario has suggested banning energy sales to the US, and there have been US concerns that Canadian potash may be denied to US farmers. Over 60% of what Canada exports to the States are products that occur early in the supply chain.
If those supplies stop, rather than just becoming more expensive, then the disruption becomes more significant. As the pandemic showed, removing a link in a supply chain can have very notable economic consequences. That's all for today.
Have a good day.
Sources & References
How we cover this story