UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'The economic “phony war”'
The current geopolitical landscape surrounding US-Iran relations represents a period of uncertainty, affecting market sentiment and pricing dynamics. Per the full note from UBS, Paul Donovan notes that investors remain skeptical about US claims of progress in peace talks, particularly given Iran's rejection of the US's 15-point proposal. This skepticism is compounded by the assumption that impending deadlines will likely be sidelined, similar to past trade disputes, contributing to a prolonged 'phony war' in economic terms. Without major disruptions in oil supplies or consumer demand, prices remain stable. This context may fuel hesitation among traders, particularly in positions reliant on geopolitical resolutions.
What the desk is arguing
The desk's analysis emphasizes that current geopolitical tensions have led to a cautious market sentiment, where unverified claims from the US concerning Iran are met with skepticism. This aligns with Donovan's view that while the market is equipped to handle higher prices, tangible economic activity remains muted. The reluctance by investors to take US statements at face value highlights the risk premium currently priced into related assets.
Evidence of this cautious sentiment is reflected in the commentary that, while US gasoline prices are rising, they still remain within affordability margins. Moreover, physical supply issues, such as those in oil and related chemicals, have not yet escalated into serious shortages that could impact pricing significantly. This lack of immediate economic fallout could explain why oil prices haven't surged despite the geopolitical tensions abroad.
How other firms see it
Market sentiment tends to be somewhat divided, with firms like jpmorgan and bofa presenting contrasting views. While jpmorgan is aligned with a more optimistic outlook on price stability given consumer resilience and manageable supply issues, bofa maintains a more cautious stance, suggesting potential for downside amid ongoing tensions and rejections of proposals.
Monitoring the developments in US-Iran relations will be key, especially as any significant breakthroughs or escalations could directly impact related currency pairs, including USD/IRR and fluctuations in oil pricing, which frequently correlates with broader market movements.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Skepticism surrounds US-Iran peace talks, impacting market sentiment.
- 02Rising gasoline prices remain manageable for consumers, with no immediate shortages.
- 03US statements are viewed with caution, framed by previous deadlock in negotiations.
Market implications
Traders should closely watch for any confirmations from Iranian officials regarding peace talks or developments in the associated oil market. A continued stability in oil prices, without major disruptions, might maintain the status quo in related currency pairs.
Risks to this view
Should new developments occur indicating a serious escalation in tensions with Iran or unforeseen shifts in oil supply dynamics, the market could react sharply. This would likely lead to increased volatility in FX pairs sensitive to commodity pricing and geopolitical risks.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Thursday the 26th of March. The United States insists that peace talks with Iran are taking place, but in the absence of Iranian confirmation, markets seem sceptical.
Even with a bias to look to the upside, markets are unwilling to accept unverified statements from the United States at face value. Iran has said that it has rejected the US 15-point proposals for peace. That is hardly surprising.
It's certainly questionable as to whether the proposals were meant to be taken seriously, given most of them have already been rejected by Iran and other key issues were simply forgotten about. In theory, US President Trump's extended deadline for reopening the Strait of Hormuz expires sometime tomorrow, but this seems to be somewhat sidelined and investors for now are content to assume it will be treated like trade dispute deadlines and conveniently ignored if necessary. In economic terms, we're still in the phony war phase and this can continue for some time.
Consumers have the resources to pay higher prices for now and possibly take some measure to cut demand moderately. The inexorable rise of US gasoline prices is still within the bounds of affordability. While panic buying and hoarding of oil in some countries might create physical supply problems because it creates an above normal level of demand, there have not yet been serious physical supply shortages, either of energy or associated chemicals.
Those shortages can indeed come and the damage of some shortages like fertilizer might be quite long-lived, but they are generally not here yet. The cost of reconstruction in Gulf countries hasn't even begun to hit. This so far is a price effect rather than an activity effect on the global economy.
All of this may help to explain why the oil price is not higher. Certainly no one thinks the current level of the oil price will induce a 20% drop in global energy demand or even a 10% drop in global energy demand. War speculation, which depends heavily on fake news, is likely to continue to dominate the markets today because there's not that much else to distract investors.
We do have some central bank speakers from the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve in particular. The Bank of England speakers come after what seems to be an overreaction at the last Monetary Policy Committee meeting, not in terms of the decision itself, but in terms of the communication style around it. Some backtracking from that extreme position would be quite nice.
Sources & References
How we cover this story