On this page · 5 sections▾
WTI crude trades at $81.02 as of the week of August 4, 2026, running 22.76% above the nine-bank Dec-2026 median target of $66.00 — a gap that flags either a consensus that has yet to capitulate upward or a spot price that has overshot near-term fundamentals. The full oil bank forecast table shows $42 separating the highest and lowest WTI calls across the panel.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (WTI): $81.02
- Cross-firm consensus, Dec-2026 (WTI desks only): $66.00 median
- Dispersion (max − min): $42.00 (Mizuho $100.00 − Macquarie $58.00)
- Gap vs spot: −22.76% (consensus sits well below current price)
- Most-bullish WTI desk: Mizuho at $100.00
- Most-bearish WTI desk: Macquarie at $58.00
Firm-by-Firm Forecast Table
The nine rows below are WTI-benchmark targets and feed the consensus statistics. The five Brent-benchmark desks — Barclays (Brent $93.30), Citi (Brent $65.00), UBS (Brent $80.00), Morgan Stanley (Brent $70.00, bearish), and Deutsche Bank (Brent $109.00, bullish) — are excluded from the median and dispersion calculations but are discussed in the analysis below.
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Macquarie | WTI $58.00 | bearish |
| Bank of America | WTI $60.00 | bearish |
| J.P. Morgan | WTI $61.00 | bearish |
| Wells Fargo | WTI $65.00 | neutral |
| ANZ | WTI $66.00 | neutral |
| HSBC | WTI $73.00 | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | WTI $80.00 | neutral |
| Westpac | WTI $85.00 | bearish |
| Mizuho | WTI $100.00 | bullish |
Why Does WTI Spot Trade So Far Above the Dec-2026 Consensus?
The 22.76% gap between spot and the nine-bank median is not a rounding artefact — it reflects a genuine structural disagreement between current market pricing and where most desks expect crude to settle by year-end.
Three forces are in tension. First, OPEC+ supply discipline has held tighter than many desks modelled entering the second half of 2026. The alliance's rolling production adjustments have kept physical barrels scarcer than the forward curve implied in Q1, providing a floor that the bearish consensus has repeatedly underestimated. Second, US shale break-evens — broadly clustered in the $55–$65/bbl range for Permian operators — mean that at current spot, incremental supply is highly economic, and the rig count response is a latent ceiling on any sustained rally. The majority of WTI desks appear to be pricing that supply response into their H2 targets. Third, Chinese demand remains the swing variable. Refinery throughput data through mid-2026 has been uneven; a sharper-than-expected slowdown in Chinese crude imports would validate the sub-$66 calls from Bank of America and J.P. Morgan, while any demand re-acceleration would support Mizuho's $100 case.
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook prices the full-year 2026 WTI average at $76.18, with Q4 specifically at $66.00 — the latter aligning almost exactly with the bank median, which gives the consensus additional credibility as a Q4 landing zone rather than a mid-year call. The FXStreet retail poll (updated July 31) sits materially higher: one-week at $84.00, one-month at $84.44, and one-quarter at $85.44, all flagged as sideways-to-bearish in directional bias. That retail-versus-institutional divergence is itself a signal worth tracking.
Which Desks Are the Outliers, and What Is Each Saying?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 WTI Crude (USD/bbl) path. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Macquarie · Bank of America · JPMorgan · Wellsfargo +4 more
8 firms aggregated · as of 2026-08-04 06:05 UTC
Mizuho is the lonely bull on the WTI panel at $100.00 — a call that requires either a sustained OPEC+ output cut beyond current pledges, a Chinese demand recovery that outpaces consensus, or a geopolitical supply disruption. At $42 above the panel floor, Mizuho's target is not a modest variant; it is a structurally different macro view.
On the Brent side, Deutsche Bank occupies the equivalent lonely-bull position with a Brent target of $109.00 — implying a WTI equivalent well above current spot once the typical Brent premium is accounted for. That alignment between Mizuho (WTI) and Deutsche Bank (Brent) suggests at least two desks are running a common thesis: that the market is underpricing OPEC+ cohesion and overestimating shale elasticity.
Macquarie holds the lonely-bear position on the WTI panel at $58.00, a level that would represent a 28% decline from current spot. A move to $58 would require the shale supply response to fully materialise, Chinese demand to disappoint, and OPEC+ cohesion to fracture — a combination of headwinds that is plausible but not the base case for most of the panel. Bank of America at $60.00 and J.P. Morgan at $61.00 are directionally aligned with Macquarie, forming a bearish cluster at the low end.
Westpac presents an interesting internal contradiction: its $85.00 WTI target sits above spot yet carries a bearish stance, implying the desk expects near-term softness before any partial recovery — or that the stance reflects a directional view on the near-term tape rather than the Dec-2026 endpoint.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price and where do banks see it by December 2026?
WTI spot is $81.02 as of the week of August 4, 2026. The nine-bank median Dec-2026 WTI target is $66.00, implying a 22.76% decline from current levels if consensus proves correct.
How wide is the disagreement across banks?
Dispersion across the nine WTI-benchmark desks is $42.00, spanning Mizuho's $100.00 bull case and Macquarie's $58.00 bear case — an unusually wide range that reflects genuine macro uncertainty rather than minor modelling differences.
What does the EIA STEO say about WTI for the rest of 2026?
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook projects a full-year 2026 WTI average of $76.18, with Q4 specifically at $66.00 — the Q4 figure sits exactly at the bank consensus median, lending independent support to the panel's year-end call.
Are Brent targets included in the consensus statistics?
No. The five Brent-benchmark desks — Barclays ($93.30), Citi ($65.00), UBS ($80.00), Morgan Stanley ($70.00), and Deutsche Bank ($109.00) — are reported separately. All consensus, dispersion, and gap figures cited here are computed over the nine WTI-benchmark desks only.
→ See the full Mizuho FX outlook for the most bullish WTI case on the panel, and track how the $100 target holds up as OPEC+ production decisions and Chinese demand data evolve through Q3 2026.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Barclays →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
UBS →
Bank Forecast
Morgan Stanley →
Bank Forecast
Westpac →
Bank Forecast
Deutsche Bank →
Bank Forecast
Mizuho →
Bank Forecast
Wellsfargo →
Bank Forecast
Macquarie →
Bank Forecast
ANZ →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
JPMorgan →
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 6 2026: Spot at 77.4, Median Target 66.0
WTI spot trades 17.3% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0, with a 42-point spread separating Mizuho's 100.0 call from Macquarie's 58.0.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check: Spot at $74.86 Sits 13% Above Dec-26 Median — Week of August 5, 2026
WTI spot at $74.86 trades 13.42% above the nine-bank Dec-26 median of $66.00, with a $42 dispersion signalling deep disagreement on the supply path.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 3 2026: Spot at $80 vs $66 Target
WTI trades at $80.06, roughly 21% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of $66, with a $42 spread separating the most bullish and bearish desks.
Share