On this page · 4 sections▾
WTI crude trades at $74.86 as of the week of August 5, 2026, roughly 13.4% above the nine-desk cross-firm median Dec-26 target of $66.00 — the full picture is in the full oil bank forecast table. Dispersion across the WTI-benchmark panel runs $42.00 from floor to ceiling, a spread wide enough to render the median only loosely actionable.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (WTI): $74.86
- Cross-firm consensus, Dec-26 (WTI desks only, n=9): $66.00
- Dispersion (max − min, WTI desks): $42.00
- Gap, spot vs consensus: −13.42% (spot well above median)
- Most-bullish WTI desk: Mizuho at $100.00
- Most-bearish WTI desk: Macquarie at $58.00
Where Does Each Desk Stand on WTI and Brent?
The table below covers all fourteen firms in the survey. The nine rows benchmarked to WTI feed the consensus statistics above; the five Brent-benchmark rows are shown separately and are excluded from the median and dispersion calculations.
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Macquarie | $58.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Bank of America | $60.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| J.P. Morgan | $61.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Citi | $65.00 (Brent) | neutral |
| Wells Fargo | $65.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| ANZ | $66.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| Morgan Stanley | $70.00 (Brent) | bearish |
| HSBC | $73.00 (WTI) | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | $80.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| UBS | $80.00 (Brent) | neutral |
| Westpac | $85.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Barclays | $93.30 (Brent) | neutral |
| Mizuho | $100.00 (WTI) | bullish |
| Deutsche Bank | $109.00 (Brent) | bullish |
What Is Driving the Bearish Consensus — OPEC+ Discipline, Shale, or Chinese Demand?
The median Dec-26 WTI target of $66.00 reflects a market structure argument rather than a single catalyst. Three forces dominate the bear case held by the majority of the panel.
First, OPEC+ supply discipline has frayed at the margin. Several members have exceeded quotas intermittently through 2025-26, and the cartel's effective spare capacity — concentrated in Saudi Arabia and the UAE — has not been deployed as a credible price floor below $70. The desks at J.P. Morgan ($61.00 WTI) and Bank of America ($60.00 WTI) sit at the bearish extreme of the WTI panel, implying a view that quota slippage accelerates into year-end and that Riyadh tolerates a lower price to defend market share.
Second, US shale break-evens remain a structural ceiling. The Permian Basin's marginal barrel is widely estimated in the $52–$58 range, meaning production economics stay positive well below current spot. With DUC (drilled-but-uncompleted) inventories still elevated, any sustained rally toward $80 risks triggering a supply response that caps the upside — a dynamic consistent with Goldman Sachs parking its WTI target at $80.00 on a neutral stance rather than leaning bullish.
Third, Chinese demand has disappointed relative to the 2024 recovery narrative. Refinery throughput data for H1 2026 tracked below IEA projections, and the property-sector drag on industrial activity has suppressed diesel consumption. Macquarie at $58.00 WTI is the most explicit in pricing a China demand miss into its year-end number.
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook provides an independent cross-check: the STEO carries a current-year average of $76.18 but projects Q4 2026 at $66.00 — precisely at the bank median, lending the consensus figure more credibility than the wide dispersion alone might suggest.
Which Desks Are the Outliers, and What Would Validate Their Views?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 WTI Crude (USD/bbl) path. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Macquarie · Bank of America · JPMorgan · Wellsfargo +4 more
8 firms aggregated · as of 2026-08-05 06:06 UTC
Mizuho is the lonely bull on the WTI panel at $100.00, a level $26 above the next-highest WTI target (Westpac at $85.00). The Mizuho case rests on a scenario in which OPEC+ enforces cuts more aggressively than the market prices, a material escalation in Middle East supply risk materialises, or Chinese stimulus exceeds expectations and pulls forward a demand recovery. Any one of those conditions in isolation is insufficient; Mizuho's $100 requires a combination.
Macquarie at $58.00 is the lonely bear. That target implies WTI trading below most estimates of Saudi fiscal break-even ($75–$80), which would require either a deliberate Saudi decision to flood supply — as seen in 2014 and briefly in 2020 — or a sharper-than-expected global demand contraction. Neither is the base case for the rest of the panel.
On the Brent side, Deutsche Bank at $109.00 Brent stands well clear of the Brent pack. The typical WTI/Brent spread runs $3–$5, so $109 Brent would imply WTI in the $104–$106 range — materially above even Mizuho's WTI target. DB's Brent call appears to embed a geopolitical risk premium that no WTI desk has matched.
The FXStreet retail poll (updated July 31, 2026) sits above the bank consensus on every horizon: $84.00 at one week, $84.44 at one month, and $85.44 at one quarter — all flagged as sideways-to-bearish in directional bias. The retail poll's elevated levels relative to the bank median likely reflect recency bias from spot's current $74.86 print rather than a structural supply view.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price forecast consensus for December 2026?
The nine WTI-benchmark desks in this survey carry a median Dec-26 target of $66.00, implying a decline of approximately 13.4% from the current spot of $74.86.
How wide is the disagreement among bank forecasters?
Dispersion across the WTI panel runs $42.00 — from Macquarie's $58.00 floor to Mizuho's $100.00 ceiling — reflecting genuine disagreement on OPEC+ compliance and Chinese demand rather than minor rounding differences.
Does the EIA STEO support the bank consensus?
The EIA STEO projects Q4 2026 WTI at $66.00, matching the bank median exactly, though its current-year average of $76.18 sits closer to spot — consistent with a gradual price decline through H2 2026.
Which firm is most bullish and which is most bearish on WTI specifically?
Mizuho holds the highest WTI target at $100.00 (bullish); Macquarie holds the lowest at $58.00 (bearish). Both are outliers relative to the $66.00 median.
→ See the full Mizuho FX outlook for the complete rationale behind the panel's most bullish WTI call.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Barclays →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
UBS →
Bank Forecast
Morgan Stanley →
Bank Forecast
Westpac →
Bank Forecast
Deutsche Bank →
Bank Forecast
Mizuho →
Bank Forecast
Wellsfargo →
Bank Forecast
Macquarie →
Bank Forecast
ANZ →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
JPMorgan →
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 6 2026: Spot at 77.4, Median Target 66.0
WTI spot trades 17.3% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0, with a 42-point spread separating Mizuho's 100.0 call from Macquarie's 58.0.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 4, 2026: Spot at $81 vs $66 Median
WTI spot at $81.02 trades 22.76% above the nine-bank Dec-2026 median of $66.00, with a $42 range separating Mizuho's $100 bull case from Macquarie's $58 floor.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 3 2026: Spot at $80 vs $66 Target
WTI trades at $80.06, roughly 21% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of $66, with a $42 spread separating the most bullish and bearish desks.
Share