On this page · 5 sections▾
WTI crude trades at 86.25 as of the week of August 31, 2026 — 30.68% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0 — while the full oil bank forecast table shows a 42-point spread between the most bullish and most bearish desks, one of the widest dispersions on record for this horizon.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (WTI): 86.25
- Cross-firm consensus median (Dec-26, WTI desks only): 66.0
- Dispersion (max − min, WTI desks): 42.0 points
- Gap vs spot: −30.68% (consensus well below current price)
- Most bullish WTI desk: Mizuho at 100.0
- Most bearish WTI desk: Macquarie at 58.0
Firm-by-Firm Table
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Macquarie | 58.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Bank of America | 60.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| J.P. Morgan | 61.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Wells Fargo | 65.0 (WTI) | neutral |
| ANZ | 66.0 (WTI) | neutral |
| HSBC | 73.0 (WTI) | bullish |
| Citi | 80.0 (Brent) | neutral |
| UBS | 80.0 (Brent) | neutral |
| Goldman Sachs | 83.0 (WTI) | bullish |
| Westpac | 85.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Barclays | 85.0 (Brent) | bullish |
| Morgan Stanley | 100.0 (Brent) | bullish |
| Mizuho | 100.0 (WTI) | bullish |
| Deutsche Bank | 109.0 (Brent) | bullish |
Brent-benchmark targets (Morgan Stanley, Barclays, Citi, UBS, Deutsche Bank) are excluded from the nine-bank WTI consensus and dispersion statistics. They are shown here for reference only.
Why Does WTI Spot Trade So Far Above Consensus?
The 30.68% gap between spot and the median Dec-26 target reflects a market that has priced in a supply-shock premium that most desks do not expect to persist. Three structural forces are in tension.
OPEC+ discipline has held tighter than many forecasters assumed entering 2026. The alliance has repeatedly deferred scheduled output increases, keeping the physical market in deficit through the summer. That discipline is the primary reason spot has remained above 85. The question for the back half of the year is whether cohesion holds as fiscal pressure mounts on lower-cost producers.
US shale break-evens complicate the bull case. The marginal Permian barrel is economic in the low-to-mid 50s on a cash-cost basis, meaning prices at current levels provide strong incentive to accelerate completions. Rig counts have responded, and the EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) 2026 annual average of 80.72 — with a Q4 path of 74.0 — implies the agency expects supply growth to weigh on prices materially before year-end. That Q4 STEO figure of 74.0 sits 14% below current spot and is broadly consistent with the bearish-to-neutral cluster in the bank table.
Chinese demand remains the swing variable. The FXStreet poll (updated August 28) shows a one-week view of 82.62, a one-month view of 84.0, and a one-quarter view of 85.11 — all flagged as sideways — suggesting retail and model-driven participants see limited near-term directional conviction. A sustained Chinese demand recovery would validate the Mizuho and Goldman Sachs bull cases; a further slowdown in industrial activity would accelerate the move toward the bearish cluster anchored by Macquarie at 58.0 and Bank of America at 60.0.
Which Desks Are the Outliers, and What Is the Lonely-Bullish and Lonely-Bearish Case?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 WTI Crude (USD/bbl) path. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Macquarie · Bank of America · JPMorgan · Wellsfargo +4 more
8 firms aggregated · as of 2026-08-31 11:09 UTC
The lonely-bullish desk on a WTI basis is Mizuho at 100.0, the only WTI-denominated forecast at or above current spot. Mizuho's case rests on sustained OPEC+ restraint and a demand rebound that most peers treat as a tail scenario. On the Brent side, Deutsche Bank at 109.0 Brent is the most aggressive call in the entire table, implying a significant Brent-WTI spread widening alongside an outright price surge.
The lonely-bearish desk is Macquarie at 58.0 WTI, a level that would require either a meaningful OPEC+ compliance breakdown, a sharper-than-expected shale supply response, or a material Chinese demand miss — or some combination of all three. Bank of America at 60.0 and J.P. Morgan at 61.0 form a bearish cluster that collectively argues the current spot premium is entirely a supply-shock risk premium that will erode as shale volumes clear.
Noteworthy on the WTI side: Westpac carries a bearish stance despite a target of 85.0 — effectively at spot — suggesting the desk's directional call is that the current level represents a ceiling rather than a floor, with downside risk the dominant scenario from here.
Goldman Sachs at 83.0 WTI bullish occupies the middle ground among the constructive desks: below spot, but the stance reflects a view that the demand trajectory supports prices above the median consensus rather than a reversion to the low-60s.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price and where do banks see it by December 2026?
WTI spot is 86.25 as of the week of August 31, 2026. The nine-bank median Dec-26 target is 66.0, implying a consensus expectation of a 30.68% decline from current levels.
How wide is the disagreement across forecasting desks?
The spread between the highest WTI target (Mizuho at 100.0) and the lowest (Macquarie at 58.0) is 42.0 points, indicating unusually high dispersion driven by divergent views on OPEC+ cohesion and Chinese demand.
What does the EIA STEO say about WTI for the rest of 2026?
The EIA STEO 2026 annual average path implies WTI at approximately 80.72, with Q4 specifically at 74.0 — consistent with the bearish-to-neutral bank cluster and well below current spot.
Are Brent targets in the same range as WTI targets?
Brent-denominated desks show a wider range at the top: Deutsche Bank at 109.0 Brent and Morgan Stanley at 100.0 Brent are the most aggressive, while Citi and UBS both sit at 80.0 Brent. These figures are not folded into the nine-bank WTI consensus statistics.
---
→ See the full Mizuho oil market outlook for the rationale behind the most bullish WTI call in the current consensus.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Morgan Stanley →
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Barclays →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
UBS →
Bank Forecast
Westpac →
Bank Forecast
Deutsche Bank →
Bank Forecast
Mizuho →
Bank Forecast
Wellsfargo →
Bank Forecast
Macquarie →
Bank Forecast
ANZ →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
JPMorgan →
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI at 83.4 vs 66.0 Consensus: A 26% Gap Heading Into Dec-26
WTI spot sits 26% above the Dec-26 bank consensus of 66.0, with a 42-point dispersion separating Mizuho's 100.0 from Macquarie's 58.0.
- WTI
WTI at $83.29 Sits 26% Above Dec-26 Consensus: Week of August 28, 2026
WTI spot at $83.29 trades 26.2% above the nine-bank Dec-26 median of $66.00, with a $42 spread separating Mizuho's bull case from Macquarie's bear.
- WTI
WTI Consensus at $66 vs $82.43 Spot: Week of August 27, 2026
WTI trades 24.89% above the nine-bank Dec-26 median of $66, with a $42 spread separating Mizuho's $100 bull case from Macquarie's $58 floor.
Share