On this page · 4 sections▾
WTI crude sits at $90.35 as of the week of November 6, 2026 — a level that stands 36.89% above the $66.00 cross-firm median Dec-26 target drawn from 11 bank desks tracked on the full oil bank forecast table. The $50 spread between the most-bullish and most-bearish year-end calls is among the widest on record for a single commodity consensus cycle.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (WTI): $90.35
- Cross-firm consensus, Dec-26 (median, 11 WTI desks): $66.00
- Dispersion (max − min): $50.00
- Gap, spot vs consensus: −36.89% (spot well above consensus)
- Most-bullish desk: Goldman Sachs at $105.00 (WTI)
- Most-bearish desk: Citi at $55.00 (WTI)
Where Do the 11 Bank Desks Stand on WTI for December 2026?
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Citi | $55.00 | very-bearish |
| Deutsche Bank | $58.00 | bearish |
| Macquarie | $58.00 | bearish |
| UBS | $65.00 | neutral |
| Wells Fargo | $65.00 | neutral |
| Morgan Stanley | $66.00 | neutral |
| ANZ | $66.00 | neutral |
| HSBC | $73.00 | bullish |
| Westpac | $85.00 | bearish |
| Mizuho | $100.00 | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | $105.00 | bullish |
On Brent, Goldman carries a $105.00 target (bullish) and UBS a $110.00 target (neutral) — both benchmarked to Brent crude, not WTI, and excluded from the consensus statistics above.
Why Is Spot So Far Above the Bank Consensus?
The 36.89% gap between spot and the median $66 target reflects a structural divergence between near-term physical tightness and the supply overhang most desks project into year-end. Three forces are in tension.
OPEC+ discipline. The cartel has maintained voluntary cuts through Q4, providing a floor that has kept spot elevated well above where the surplus-focused desks expected prices to be by now. The question is duration: several desks model a partial unwind of those cuts beginning Q1 2027, which mechanically pulls their Dec-26 targets lower even if current compliance holds.
US shale break-evens. Permian Basin break-evens cluster in the $45–$55 range for the median operator, meaning US production remains economic at nearly every scenario on the table — including Citi's $55 floor. That supply elasticity caps the upside case and is a primary reason the consensus skews bearish despite spot strength. Shale's response lag (roughly two to three quarters from rig count to first barrel) means the market is currently absorbing a supply wave that was drilled into a higher price environment.
Chinese demand. Petrochemical and transport demand out of China has been the swing variable. Morgan Stanley flags petrochemical feedstock demand as a partial offset to weaker gasoline consumption, keeping its neutral $66 target intact. A demand disappointment from China — the consensus risk scenario — is the mechanism through which the bearish cluster ($55–$66) becomes realised.
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook prices in a Q4 2026 average of $97.00 and a full-year 2026 average of approximately $87.99 — both materially above the bank median but below Goldman's $105 call. The FXStreet poll, updated November 6, shows a 1-week read of $91.00 (sideways), a 1-month read of $85.28 (bearish), and a 1-quarter read of $80.94 (bearish). The non-bank benchmarks therefore sit between the EIA's relatively constructive path and the bank consensus's more bearish year-end destination.
Which Desks Are the Outliers and What Is Their Reasoning?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 WTI Crude (USD/bbl) path. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Citi · Deutsche Bank · Macquarie · Wellsfargo +6 more
10 firms aggregated · as of 2026-11-06 16:04 UTC
Lonely bull: Goldman Sachs at $105.00 is the sole desk with a triple-digit WTI target and the only one whose year-end call sits above current spot. Goldman's thesis rests on sustained OPEC+ compliance and a tighter-than-consensus read on non-OPEC supply growth. Its Brent target is also $105.00, implying a near-flat WTI/Brent spread — an unusual assumption that itself signals conviction in physical tightness rather than a financial-market premium. Note that Goldman's published views are synthesised from public commentary rather than a primary research PDF, which warrants a modest confidence discount.
Lonely bear: Citi at $55.00 is the most bearish desk on the street, 18.2% below the next-lowest targets from Deutsche Bank and Macquarie (both at $58.00). Citi's published rationale: a massive surplus builds through Q4 as non-OPEC supply — primarily US, Guyana, and Brazil — overwhelms demand growth, and OPEC+ cuts prove insufficient to absorb the overhang. At $55, Citi is essentially calling for a break below the median Permian break-even, which would require either a demand shock or a cartel compliance failure.
Mizuho at $100.00 is the second-most-bullish desk and, alongside Goldman, forms the bullish minority. Westpac at $85.00 occupies an unusual position: its target is the highest among the bearish-labelled desks, sitting above the FXStreet 1-month poll and close to the EIA full-year average — a bearish stance that in absolute terms still implies only a modest decline from spot.
The neutral cluster — UBS, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, ANZ — converges tightly between $65 and $66, forming the gravitational centre of the consensus and anchoring the $66 median.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price and the bank consensus target?
WTI spot is $90.35 as of November 6, 2026. The cross-firm median Dec-26 target across 11 bank desks is $66.00, implying a 36.89% decline if consensus is realised.
How wide is the disagreement among banks?
The spread between the highest target (Goldman at $105.00) and the lowest (Citi at $55.00) is $50.00 — an unusually large dispersion that reflects genuine structural disagreement on OPEC+ durability and Chinese demand trajectory.
What do the EIA and FXStreet polls say?
The EIA STEO projects a Q4 2026 average of $97.00 and a full-year 2026 average of roughly $87.99. The FXStreet poll (updated November 6) shows $91.00 for one week (sideways), $85.28 for one month (bearish), and $80.94 for one quarter (bearish) — all above the bank median but trending lower over the horizon.
Are Brent targets included in the consensus figures?
No. The two Brent-benchmark rows — Goldman at $105.00 (Brent) and UBS at $110.00 (Brent) — are reported separately and excluded from all consensus, dispersion, and gap calculations, which are computed solely over the 11 WTI-benchmark desks.
→ See the full Goldman Sachs FX outlook at Goldman Sachs forecasts for the most-bullish year-end scenario on the street.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI at $90.83 vs $66 Consensus: Where Banks Stand in Nov 2026
WTI spot at $90.83 sits 37.62% above the 11-desk median Dec-26 target of $66, with a $50 spread separating Goldman's $105 bull case from Citi's $55 floor.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of November 4, 2026: Spot at $95 vs $66 Median
WTI spot at $95.23 sits 44% above the 11-bank Dec-26 median of $66, with a $45 dispersion signalling deep disagreement on the supply outlook.
- WTI
WTI Consensus at $75.5 vs $100.5 Spot: Week of November 2, 2026
WTI trades 33% above the six-desk median Dec-26 target of $75.5, with a $42 spread separating the most bullish and most bearish calls.
Share