UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Another convulsion'
The desk interprets recent volatility in technology equities, as highlighted by UBS's Paul Donovan, as symptomatic of broader economic trends with potential implications for FX stability. Donovan notes that the KOSPI index has reverted to levels seen in April, emphasizing that the rapid ascension of technology stocks is curtailing the overall economic fallout from recent disturbances. While the equity market turbulence may seem alarming, it appears to exert limited influence on consumer behavior, primarily due to middle-income households modifying their savings rather than investing directly in stocks. This perspective underlines the expectation that any prolonged downturn in equities could be balanced by traditional investment approaches, particularly if uncertainties surrounding the geopolitical landscape, such as US-Iran relations, stabilize. Per the full note source, broader FX implications arise from these equity dynamics in the context of rising crude oil prices, which remain a critical consideration ahead of the upcoming US economic data releases.
What the desk is arguing
The desk sees the volatility in tech equities as a reflection of broader market uncertainties rather than direct economic distress, aligning with Donovan's commentary. A notable point is the KOSPI's retreat to April levels, indicating that while equity markets are turbulent, their immediate economic consequences are mitigated by liquidity from household savings. This suggests a shift in consumer behavior is buffering the economy against shocks from technology sector disruptions.
Moreover, the desk emphasizes that rising crude oil prices, exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, could counterbalance these market fluctuations. This reflects a cautious optimism that consumer actions, such as reduced savings rates, will hedge against the potential economic implications of ongoing equity volatility.
Where it sits in our coverage
With respect to our FX forecasts, we maintain a consensus target of 1.075 for the USD/EUR pair, with a range from 1.04 to 1.12 as we analyze the shifting landscape. Specific firm targets leading up to December 2026 include: - jpmorgan: 1.10 - bofa: 1.04
The desk's perspective aligns closely with jpmorgan, whose target sits at the upper end of our range, suggesting an inclination towards a stronger dollar amid global market fluctuations.
How other firms see it
Firms like jpmorgan and goldman reflect a consensus view supporting dollar strength, while bofa presents a more cautious outlook amidst the uncertainties in equity markets and crude oil prices. The divergence in sentiment highlights the differing assessments of geopolitical risks and their impact on consumer spending.
It’s crucial to monitor the evolving dynamics of USD/EUR, particularly as shifts in crude oil prices emerge, which could reaffirm or contradict the views presented here.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Technology sector volatility reflects broader uncertainties rather than direct economic distress.
- 02Middle-income households are pivotal, adjusting savings rates but not significantly investing in equities.
- 03Crude oil prices remain a crucial determinant for consumer sentiment and market stability.
- 04Geopolitical tensions influence broader economic planning and decision-making.
Market implications
Traders should watch the USD/EUR pair for responsiveness to tech stock performance, particularly as indicators of consumer behavior emerge in response to changing crude prices. The stability of these correlations might highlight potential positioning strategies ahead of US economic indicators.
Risks to this view
A reversal of this outlook could occur if geopolitical tensions, especially related to the US-Iran negotiations, escalate unpredictably, significantly impacting crude oil prices and consequently consumer spending behavior. Additionally, if technology stocks see a sustained downward trend leading to broader economic concerns, it could also diminish the supportive effects of household savings.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's 7 o'clock in the morning London time on Tuesday the 28th of July. The technology sector is having one of its periodic convulsions again, although there is no specific economic driver of this.
The Korean KOSPI index is back at levels not seen since April of this year. That fact rather neatly summarises the muted economic concern arising from this sort of noise. The rise in technology equities has been so rapid that any disruptive economic effects have not really had time to sink in.
The economic damage of the war in the Gulf has been contained by middle-income households lowering their savings rate. Equity wealth effects have had little to do with this, because such households are rarely big equity owners, certainly not in a direct way, and it is the stock of cash savings and the room to cut how much income is saved each month that have been shoring up the global economy. There are potentially investment implications if the equity route is prolonged, but this may be offset by investment in more conventional senses.
US President Trump has said there is a good chance talks with Iran will make progress. This is not entirely unexpected. Markets have started to notice that such optimism on talks might be inversely correlated with the consumer price of gasoline in the States, currently comfortably over $4 per US gallon and well above the circa $2.50 that most US households would consider to be the fair price for gasoline.
Crude oil prices have continued to decline as market optimism bias has kicked back in. Perhaps the bigger question now is how the uncertainty and the unpredictability is affecting corporate planning. Things like the don't fire, don't hire approach to policy were born in the uncertainty of US tariff policy, but anecdotal evidence is suggesting that this freezing of decision making may be being perpetuated by the uncertainty of a war that has been dragging on for some time.
This is different to the Russia-Ukraine war, where the economic consequences have been relatively predictable and can be factored in. There is a wide range of potential outcomes from the Gulf War and that, combined with the unpredictable leadership on both sides, makes factoring in any specific scenario very difficult for corporate planners. The UK has offered up some modest evidence of disinflation ahead of the Bank of England's policy decision on Thursday.
The British Retail Consortium's Shop Price Index came in lower than expected for July, with prices rising 0.9% year over year. Of course, the issue with July's overall inflation will be the weirdness that is electricity pricing in the UK, not the price of things sold in stores, but nonetheless, in terms of inflation perceptions, this is potentially helpful. In politics, Count Binface, the leading candidate to replace the far-right reform leader Farage as a Member of Parliament, announced their manifesto.
Market reactions so far have been muted. The data calendar is not offering much to divert investor attention. US trade data for June might get some attention, given the politicisation of trade and the rise of economic nationalism, but tariffs are causing all sorts of distortions to trading patterns.
US consumer confidence data remains plagued by partisan bias, but even if economically redundant to the extent that it feeds into the political process, it probably merits a brief glance. That's all for today. Have a good day.
This material has been prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS Switzerland AG, regulated by FINMA in Switzerland. It's subsidiaries, or affiliates, collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA-SIPC.
The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only, and it is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient.
This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story