UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Diminished guidance'
The desk interprets President Trump's recent social media assertion about guiding commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz as a strategic move aimed at stabilizing the oil markets amidst rising gasoline prices in the US. Per the full note from UBS, the president's claim was not accompanied by indications of naval escorts, which could dilute the perceived U.S. commitment to naval security in the region. With gasoline prices nearing $4.5 per gallon, there is substantial pressure for the administration to project reassurance to quell market volatility as physical shortages loom closer.
What the desk is arguing
The desk posits that Trump's announcements are primarily rhetorical, reflecting the administration's need to manage public perception and market expectations rather than signalling immediate military action. This perspective is reinforced by the reactions emanating from Iran, particularly the denouncement of the president's statements as delusional by Iranian officials. The instability in oil prices suggests that the market is responding skeptically to the administration's calming rhetoric.
Furthermore, the imminent pressure on U.S. gasoline prices serves as a critical factor influencing this narrative. With prices nearing USD 4.5 per gallon, the urgency for the administration to communicate a sense of control over the situation is heightened. This aligns with observed market behavior, indicating a lack of confidence in the U.S.'s ability to effectively manage geopolitical tensions in the region.
Where it sits in our coverage
... (omit this section entirely if no internal coverage data)
How other firms see it
... (omit this section entirely if no internal coverage data)
What the calendar says
... (omit this section entirely if no upcoming events)
Key takeaways
- 01Trump's statements reflect an attempt to stabilize oil markets amidst rising gasoline prices.
- 02Iran denounces U.S. claims as delusional, indicating heightened regional tensions.
- 03Market reaction suggests skepticism about the U.S.'s commitment to security in the Strait of Hormuz.
- 04U.S. gasoline prices nearing $4.5 serve as an additional pressure point for the administration.
Market implications
Traders should monitor oil price trends as they are closely linked to geopolitical developments in the Strait of Hormuz. The reaction of gasoline prices will also serve as a barometer for market sentiment. Upcoming reports on U.S. supply levels may further influence trading decisions.
Risks to this view
A significant escalation in military tensions from either side could lead to drastic shifts in oil supply expectations, invalidating the current stabilization narrative. Additionally, if U.S. gasoline prices continue to rise sharply, it may compel the administration to take more direct action, altering market dynamics dramatically.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at GBS Global Wealth Management. It's 6.30 in the morning London time on Monday the 4th of May. US President Trump posted on social media that the United States would guide ships through the Strait of Hormuz.
Media reports suggest this would not involve military escorts. London's Parliamentary Security Committee head Aziz is quoted describing Trump's posts as delusional. The oil market is giving weight to the Iranian view for now, with little change in prices after an initial bout of volatility.
US gasoline prices are approaching $4.50 per US gallon, which keeps up the domestic political pressure. This no doubt creates a desire for optimistic rhetoric from the administration to try and guide oil prices. However, as the global economy approaches the point where physical shortages become a more serious issue, the effect of rhetoric, whether on social media or not, has less and less impact in the markets.
Markets are also less inclined to accept Trump's posts unless independently confirmed by Iran or others. Fresh from last week's Central Bank meetings, we have some Central Bank speakers today. The European Central Bank has some uncertainty around its policy outlook, so the fact that there are no fewer than six speakers on the agenda offers some interest to investors.
Of course, some of the comments will be quite predictable. Nagel is likely to sound hawkish, obviously. It's a case of looking through the existing biases to see what actual facts might motivate future policy decisions.
The US Federal Reserve's Williams is also speaking. Williams has weight as a competent economist at the Fed, with Fed Chair nominee Walsh offering some less conventional views on issues like reducing the Fed's balance sheet, without any obvious sign of declining liquidity preference. The views of a sensible economist will be important to hear.
Given Walsh's reputation, the support of credible Fed members will be important in building a coalition of support. The Japanese yen has been somewhat volatile in Asian trading following intervention by the Japanese Ministry of Finance in support of the currency last week. Japan is out for the Golden Week holidays this week, which complicates any interpretation of the moves, but it is clear that the Japanese government wants to limit the cost-of-living shock of currency weakness.
While the effect of a weaker yen on imports of finished goods is limited and takes time to have an effect on prices, the impact on the import of commodities is immediate, and of course very relevant given the volatility of the oil price. On the data calendar today, there are assorted business sentiment polls from Europe, which are good at triggering headlines, but otherwise not much use. US final durable and capital goods data and factory orders numbers for March are due.
The enthusiasm for artificial intelligence has helped to push orders data higher, and inflation pressures will also increase the value of the orders. Unfortunately, data is not inflation-adjusted. That's all for today.
Have a good day. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only, and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.
The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story