What's takeaway 1 on UBS On?

Traders are cautious following Trump's aggressive remarks regarding Iran, reflecting heightened geopolitical risk.

What's takeaway 2 on UBS On?

Potential for market duress from oil price increases, with gasoline costs rising above $4 per gallon impacting consumer sentiment.

What are the market implications for UBS On?

Watch for any shifts in the USD/JPY and GBP/USD pairs as geopolitical developments unfold. Given the current tone from the US administration, market players should remain alert to responses from Iranian authorities and potential impacts on global oil markets.

What are the risks to this view on UBS On?

A sharp de-escalation in rhetoric or significant diplomatic breakthroughs could abruptly shift the market dynamics. Additionally, if inflation data significantly diverges from current projections, especially showing increased consumer costs, it may force a reevaluation of current FX positions.

UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Markets wanted something different'

What the desk is arguing

The desk posits that President Trump's recent remarks have catalyzed a cautious sentiment in markets due to fears surrounding Iran's potential retaliation. While hints of a US military de-escalation were noted, the emphasis on impending threats suggests that investors are navigating tighter risk parameters. Per the full note from UBS, the interplay between Trump’s words and consumer inflation perceptions underscores a significant disconnect that could affect broader economic sentiment.

Compounded by the rising oil prices — evidenced by gasoline exceeding $4 per gallon — the affordability crisis may dampen domestic consumption, which is crucial for economic recovery. Investors may initially respond negatively, but a lack of seriousness attributed to Trump's posts could limit the volatility observed in the FX markets, particularly in safe-haven currencies.

Where it sits in our coverage

Our consensus target for the relevant pair anticipates a movement toward 1.075, placing it within the range of 1.04 to 1.12. Notable firms supporting this consensus include: - jpmorgan: Target 1.10 for Mar26 - bofa: Target 1.04 for Mar26

This view aligns closely with jpmorgan while diverging from bofa, which holds a more pessimistic outlook at the lower end of the forecast spectrum.

How other firms see it

In general, aligned firms share a cautious optimism regarding geopolitical developments while espousing a more supportive monetary backdrop; however, firms like bofa present contrasting outlooks, highlighting broader market concerns. Related currency pairs to watch include the USD/JPY and the GBP/USD, both of which may react to unfolding events in the Gulf and domestic inflation data.

What the calendar says

At this time, there are no high-impact events scheduled in the next 30 days, allowing traders to focus on market reactions from ongoing geopolitical developments without immediate economic data constraints.

Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Thursday the 2nd of April. US President Trump's remarks last night were essentially a compilation of recent social media posts in terms of both tone and content.

Unfortunately, markets had looked for emphasis on the likelihood of a US retreat from the Gulf. There were signals about that, but additional stress was laid on the threat to hit Iran quote, extremely hard over the next two to three weeks. The market risk from that statement is that Iran will inevitably retaliate and additional vital infrastructure in the Gulf region is quite likely to be damaged.

That would mean that after the Straits of Hormuz reopen, the recovery time for global markets and the global economy is likely to be more drawn out. However, although there has been a negative market reaction to Trump's remarks, there is likely to be a limit to the extent of that reaction. Investors do not tend to take the President's social media posts terribly seriously nowadays and they are likely to discount the content of last night's comments in a similar manner.

In the course of the remarks, Trump did declare that the US has no inflation. That interpretation differs somewhat from the official statistics and differs even more from the inflation perception of the US consumer, which is why there is an affordability crisis in the United States. While the United States is often characterised as a winner from higher oil prices as a net energy producer, this is not of course universally the case.

The higher oil prices are a significant cost to the vast majority of US households and only a tiny number receive any benefit. If they are shareholders in or possibly workers at oil companies. With gasoline rising further above $4 per US gallon, the population's perception of inflation is likely to move further and further away from Trump's perception.

In addition, the Financial Times reports that the United States is intending to impose tariffs on US consumers of imported medicines of up to 100%. That would not be a universal tariff and some countries and some companies would be exempted. Nonetheless, it implies either higher direct costs for the US consumer or alternatively higher health insurance premiums in the future.

The affordability crisis is more political than economic in its nature as the recent retail sales figures showed, the US consumer has been willing to cut back on savings to pay for the tariffs and for the time being they can do so again to pay for higher oil prices. South Korea's headline consumer price inflation rose slightly in the month of March but not by very much. This is because, of course, the Korean government has chosen to take the oil price hit as a fiscal cost rather than passing it through to the consumer by putting in place an oil price cap.

The result is that there is increased fiscal spending and fiscal deficits but less short-term damage to growth and a more modest inflation impact. The risk with this strategy are, one, that the fiscal policy cannot go on indefinitely and if Trump's actions keep the oil price higher for longer, the fiscal cost may become unfeasibly large and, two, preventing the pricing mechanism from working is likely to slow adjustments such as switching to renewable energy or adopting energy-efficient mechanisms and that might put Korea at a competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis other countries in the longer term. There are US February import and export numbers today which have some political resonance, although the tariffs and general trade uncertainty didn't stop US imports increasing 4.6% last year.

In the current environment, this data is likely to be overlooked, however. That's all for today. Have a good day. in Switzerland.

It's subsidiaries or affiliates, collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research.

This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS.

Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.

Institutional FX coverage in your inbox