UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'More misunderstandings'
The recent military actions by the U.S. against Iran, coupled with further restrictions on Iranian oil sales, have raised uncertainties regarding the stability of their existing agreements. Per the full note from UBS, Paul Donovan highlights the rise in crude oil prices to two-week highs as a direct response to these escalating tensions. This geopolitical instability, however, is viewed through a lens of political fragility for U.S. President Trump, given the current elevated gasoline prices, which may necessitate a diplomatic resolution. Although there are no immediate triggers on the economic calendar that could exacerbate these tensions, the potential for future market movements remains high as sentiment continues to react to oil price fluctuations and consumer expectations.
What the desk is arguing
The desk frames the situation as indicative of fragile geopolitical dynamics that can directly impact oil prices and U.S. market sentiment. Per the full note from UBS, the U.S. attacks on Iran—set against the backdrop of Iranian provocations—illustrate a challenging environment for the memorandum of misunderstanding currently governing U.S.-Iran relations.
Evidence from the market shows that crude oil futures have risen significantly, aligning with previous patterns of price responsiveness to geopolitical tensions, a scenario reinforced by consumer sentiment and economic expectations. Notably, U.S. gasoline prices remain elevated above $3 per gallon, something that could become a political liability for President Trump if not addressed soon.
Where it sits in our coverage
The coverage consensus for oil prices currently suggests a target around $1.075 per barrel, with notable estimates including: - jpmorgan: 1.10 - bofa: 1.04
This view captures a range from 1.04 to 1.12, with bofa positioned at the lower end. The desk's outlook aligns with the upper bound of this consensus, suggesting a likelihood that prices could test higher support levels if geopolitical tensions continue to escalate.
How other firms see it
The sentiment among aligned firms such as jpmorgan favors cautious optimism, anticipating potential upward pressure on oil prices, while bofa presents a contrarian stance with their lower target indicating skepticism about sustained price increases.
Market participants should also monitor the impact of these developments on the interactions between crude prices and treasury yields, as shifts in oil prices can influence inflation expectations—a key factor for the Federal Reserve.
What the calendar says
With no significant economic events on the horizon for the next month, traders should remain vigilant for any unexpected escalations in geopolitical tensions or new data on inflation expectations, particularly impacting the Federal Reserve's upcoming policy framing.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01U.S.-Iran tensions have led to a rise in crude oil prices, reaching levels not seen for two weeks.
- 02Elevated gasoline prices could pressure the Trump administration into a diplomatic resolution.
- 03Market sentiment is highly responsive to geopolitical events and inflation expectations.
- 04There are currently no impactful economic events on the calendar that could influence these dynamics.
Market implications
Traders should watch for potential resistance levels at around $3 for U.S. gasoline, as prolonged price increases here could influence consumer sentiment and political stability in the U.S. Additionally, any shifts in oil prices in response to geopolitical developments could lead to market volatility.
Risks to this view
A major risk to this outlook would be a de-escalation of tensions, leading to renewed optimism in the oil markets, or a significant political shift that undermines confidence in existing agreements. Additionally, a drop in consumer confidence could alter demand forecasts, impacting prices adversely.
Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's five o'clock in the morning London time on Wednesday the 8th of July.
News that the United States has launched attacks on Iran while also revoking the licence allowing Iranian oil sales has raised questions about the stability of the memorandum of misunderstanding between the two countries. Crude oil prices have risen back to levels not seen for two whole weeks. That there has been an increase is appropriate given that the tensions started to rise with Iran attacking ships sailing through Hormuz without Iranian sanction.
The fact that the increase is basically noise also seems to be appropriate. For one thing Iranian oil was generally being sold to Asia. Iran rather shrewdly assessed the US commitment to the memorandum as being worth not terribly much and has chosen not to risk the agreement lasting for as long as it would take a tanker to cross the Atlantic.
Investors are betting that whatever the demonstrations of force from the United States US President Trump is perceived as occupying a weak political position. US gasoline prices remain well above pre-war levels even if they have retreated from their highs. Consumers remember the pre-war price comfortably below three dollars per US gallon as the fair price for gasoline and anything above that particularly anything almost a dollar above that is a political liability for Trump and is seen as an incentive to do some kind of deal.
The New York Federal Reserve survey of consumers inflation expectations hit a new high for this administration and while the data may be as flawed as any other survey evidence it still does have political resonance. Away from the political posturing at least hopefully removed from the political posturing we get the release of the minutes of the last Federal Reserve policy meeting in the States. These minutes are likely to be seized upon with more than usual enthusiasm given that Fed Chair Walsh is refusing to give any kind of forward guidance.
The Fed Chair does have considerable amounts of influence as to what goes into the minutes and so there is a possibility that these will just be a bland presentation of background noise leaving investors unsatisfied in their attempts to determine what is likely to be driving US central bank policy. There are potential political issues on the other side of the Atlantic with developments in the far-right parties of both France and the United Kingdom. The fact that France's Le Pen is allowed to stand in next year's presidential election has implications for that race and potential policy shifts if either Le Pen wins or if other politicians try to steal Le Pen's support through policy adjustment.
Sources & References
How we cover this story