FX BANK FORECAST · COVERAGE
Institutional FX coverage in your inbox
Aggregated year-end forecasts, scenario shifts, and curated analyst notes from 30 institutional desks. No promotion.
FX BANK FORECAST · COVERAGE
Aggregated year-end forecasts, scenario shifts, and curated analyst notes from 30 institutional desks. No promotion.
The recent military actions by the U.S. against Iran, coupled with further restrictions on Iranian oil sales, have raised uncertainties regarding the stability of their existing agreements. Per the full note from UBS, Paul Donovan highlights the rise in crude oil prices to two-week highs as a direct response to these escalating tensions. This geopolitical instability, however, is viewed through a lens of political fragility for U.S. President Trump, given the current elevated gasoline prices, which may necessitate a diplomatic resolution. Although there are no immediate triggers on the economic calendar that could exacerbate these tensions, the potential for future market movements remains high as sentiment continues to react to oil price fluctuations and consumer expectations.
The desk frames the situation as indicative of fragile geopolitical dynamics that can directly impact oil prices and U.S. market sentiment. Per the full note from UBS, the U.S. attacks on Iran—set against the backdrop of Iranian provocations—illustrate a challenging environment for the memorandum of misunderstanding currently governing U.S.-Iran relations.
Evidence from the market shows that crude oil futures have risen significantly, aligning with previous patterns of price responsiveness to geopolitical tensions, a scenario reinforced by consumer sentiment and economic expectations. Notably, U.S. gasoline prices remain elevated above $3 per gallon, something that could become a political liability for President Trump if not addressed soon.
The coverage consensus for oil prices currently suggests a target around $1.075 per barrel, with notable estimates including: - jpmorgan: 1.10 - bofa: 1.04
This view captures a range from 1.04 to 1.12, with bofa positioned at the lower end. The desk's outlook aligns with the upper bound of this consensus, suggesting a likelihood that prices could test higher support levels if geopolitical tensions continue to escalate.
The sentiment among aligned firms such as jpmorgan favors cautious optimism, anticipating potential upward pressure on oil prices, while bofa presents a contrarian stance with their lower target indicating skepticism about sustained price increases.
Market participants should also monitor the impact of these developments on the interactions between crude prices and treasury yields, as shifts in oil prices can influence inflation expectations—a key factor for the Federal Reserve.
With no significant economic events on the horizon for the next month, traders should remain vigilant for any unexpected escalations in geopolitical tensions or new data on inflation expectations, particularly impacting the Federal Reserve's upcoming policy framing.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
Market implications
Traders should watch for potential resistance levels at around $3 for U.S. gasoline, as prolonged price increases here could influence consumer sentiment and political stability in the U.S. Additionally, any shifts in oil prices in response to geopolitical developments could lead to market volatility.
Risks to this view
A major risk to this outlook would be a de-escalation of tensions, leading to renewed optimism in the oil markets, or a significant political shift that undermines confidence in existing agreements. Additionally, a drop in consumer confidence could alter demand forecasts, impacting prices adversely.
Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's five o'clock in the morning London time on Wednesday the 8th of July.
News that the United States has launched attacks on Iran while also revoking the licence allowing Iranian oil sales has raised questions about the stability of the memorandum of misunderstanding between the two countries. Crude oil prices have risen back to levels not seen for two whole weeks. That there has been an increase is appropriate given that the tensions started to rise with Iran attacking ships sailing through Hormuz without Iranian sanction.
The fact that the increase is basically noise also seems to be appropriate. For one thing Iranian oil was generally being sold to Asia. Iran rather shrewdly assessed the US commitment to the memorandum as being worth not terribly much and has chosen not to risk the agreement lasting for as long as it would take a tanker to cross the Atlantic.
Investors are betting that whatever the demonstrations of force from the United States US President Trump is perceived as occupying a weak political position. US gasoline prices remain well above pre-war levels even if they have retreated from their highs. Consumers remember the pre-war price comfortably below three dollars per US gallon as the fair price for gasoline and anything above that particularly anything almost a dollar above that is a political liability for Trump and is seen as an incentive to do some kind of deal.
The New York Federal Reserve survey of consumers inflation expectations hit a new high for this administration and while the data may be as flawed as any other survey evidence it still does have political resonance. Away from the political posturing at least hopefully removed from the political posturing we get the release of the minutes of the last Federal Reserve policy meeting in the States. These minutes are likely to be seized upon with more than usual enthusiasm given that Fed Chair Walsh is refusing to give any kind of forward guidance.
The Fed Chair does have considerable amounts of influence as to what goes into the minutes and so there is a possibility that these will just be a bland presentation of background noise leaving investors unsatisfied in their attempts to determine what is likely to be driving US central bank policy. There are potential political issues on the other side of the Atlantic with developments in the far-right parties of both France and the United Kingdom. The fact that France's Le Pen is allowed to stand in next year's presidential election has implications for that race and potential policy shifts if either Le Pen wins or if other politicians try to steal Le Pen's support through policy adjustment.
There are also potential implications around ECB President Lagarde's tenure as Lagarde has indicated an interest in getting involved in the presidential election and if Lagarde serves their full term then the new French President would have a role in choosing the next ECB President. An early departure by Lagarde would leave Macron exerting influence instead. Meanwhile in the UK the impending resignation of Reform Party leader Farage as a Member of Parliament in the wake of allegations of financial irregularities will trigger a by-election without the participation of most major political parties.
Because the British far-right is very focused on personalities this does have some bearing on politics but as a general election is not due for three years the impact on financial markets is more muted than in the French case. There are some ECB speakers scheduled again today. Recent comments from the ECB have tended to play down the idea of there being a series of rate hikes or some automatic trajectory of tightening.
The NATO summit is also kicking off and is likely to keep defence spending in focus. Market interest here is more around the economic stimulus and the fiscal effects of defence spending rather than the details of the spending per se. That's all for today.
Have a good day. This material has been prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS Switzerland AG regulated by FINMA in Switzerland. It's subsidiaries or affiliates collectively referred to as UBS.
In the USA UBS Financial Services Inc is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC. The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.
The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient. This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
How we cover this story
Live cross-firm bank consensus across 30 desks — FX, oil & gold
View bank forecasts