UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Policy responses'
The desk interprets the recent developments regarding Middle East peace negotiations as a moderate positive for risk assets, but remains cautious due to insufficient confirmation from credible sources. According to UBS's Paul Donovan, a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon has been established, reducing immediate geopolitical tensions; however, markets are yet to incorporate U.S. President Trump's optimistic claims about Iran's compliance with U.S. terms. As investor appetite remains subdued, particularly evident in Asian equity markets, uncertainty persists around central banks' policy responses to this evolving narrative. Per the full note source, central banks, like the Bank of England and the ECB, are still adopting a wait-and-see approach, signaling no imminent shifts in monetary policy at this moment.
What the desk is arguing
The desk perceives that while the ceasefire may improve sentiment marginally, solidifying risks in the region requires deeper confirmation. Per the commentary from UBS, key financial markets are hesitating to price in the optimistic remarks from President Trump, as evidenced by weakened Asian equities following his statements.
Furthermore, central banks are expected to maintain their cautious stances. As pointed out, Bank of England Governor Bailey emphasized the absence of urgent rate hikes, aligning with current market sentiment that calls for a slow policy progression.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for the relevant currency pair currently sits at 1.075, with a range from 1.04 to 1.12. Notable firms contributing to this outlook include: - jpmorgan: 1.10 (Mar26) - bofa: 1.04 (Mar26)
While our desk's stance aligns closely with jpmorgan, it is positioned at the upper end of the spread, indicating a relatively optimistic outlook compared to the lower target set by bofa.
How other firms see it
Firms such as jpmorgan and others are maintaining a similar cautious yet optimistic stance, given the geopolitical developments, while bofa positions itself more conservatively amidst ongoing uncertainties. These market responses suggest diverging views on how quickly markets will incorporate positive potential outcomes.
Watch the EUR/USD trajectory closely, as it may reflect broader trends influenced by ECB policy adjustments in light of euro area stability amid geopolitical risks.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01The ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon is a positive sign but requires further validation to impact markets meaningfully.
- 02Trump's assertions regarding Iran have not been substantiated, leading to market skepticism and weakness in equities.
- 03Central banks remain cautious, signaling no immediate policy shifts, which is reflected in the current rate stance from the Bank of England and the ECB.
- 04The geopolitical landscape will play a critical role in shaping investment sentiment moving forward.
Market implications
Watch for any credible confirmations regarding the U.S.-Iran negotiations, as this could significantly influence market sentiment. Additionally, monitoring the EUR/USD movement would provide insights into how central banks are reacting to these geopolitical developments.
Risks to this view
The call could be invalidated if the situation in the Middle East deteriorates, leading to heightened tensions and potential military actions. Any negative economic data or drastic shifts in central bank policy could also disrupt the current market optimism.
Good morning. This is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning, London time, on Friday the 17th of April.
A ceasefire has been agreed between Israel and Lebanon, scheduled to last for ten days, lessening a potential obstacle to a wider peace agreement in the Middle East. US President Trump has asserted, without citing evidence, that a peace deal is looking very good and that Iran is agreeing to US terms. Markets have been unwilling to price that assertion in the absence of confirmation from an alternative source, and equities have been weaker in Asian trading.
The bias to optimism remains in markets, but investors still need something credible to work with. Aside from developments in the Gulf, the focus for markets today is central banks and their reactions to developments in the Gulf situation. With the IMF spring bake still ongoing, the agenda still has a selection of central bank comments.
Bank of England Governor Bailey already spoke earlier this week to stress that there was no rush to raise rates. This follows the rather unfortunate hawkish tone after the last Bank of England meeting, and Bailey was clearly putting on a hair shirt and doing the appropriate penance. Bank of England Chief Economist Pill is being wheeled out today, and should reiterate this general line.
Central banks should react to second round effects, and it's far too soon to be seeing any second round effects. ECB Chief Economist Lane was making precisely that point in Washington yesterday, noting that the ECB does not see decisive effects from the war for now. The account of the last policy meeting of the ECB stressed a lot of this, talking about keeping options open, and stressing the good economic position that existed before the war's start.
The ECB's pre-war policy stance was neutral, so there is no particular pressure to ease rates. It is possible that the ECB implements an increase in euro area rates if the sticker shock of an oil price increase offends enough council members, but that would almost certainly be a policy error. US monetary policy is more complicated still.
The effects of tariffs on inflation are starting to gradually fade from the numbers, but inflation perceptions remain high, and the higher oil price means that most US households are suffering as a consequence of the war. Consumers do not have much power to do anything about their inflation perceptions, at least not until the mid-term elections, so second-round inflation effects are likely to be minimal. The policy outlook is further clouded by the legal and political issues that surround the Fed leadership, with increased scrutiny of the finances of Fed Chair nominee Walsh, for instance.
Sources & References
How we cover this story