UBS On-Air: Paul Donovan Daily Audio 'Toll time'
The desk interprets the latest UBS commentary as highlighting geopolitical tensions and their implications for oil flows, especially through the crucial Strait of Hormuz. Per the full note, Iran and Oman have agreed on a toll-sharing mechanism, indicating that Iran intends to maintain strict control over this vital shipping route post-conflict. This arrangement likely foreshadows continued challenges to oil supply from the region, although the immediate market implications remain muted amid broader economic data that aligns with consensus expectations for U.S. interest rates. Traders should note the complex interplay of these geopolitical developments with domestic economic indicators as they navigate the markets.
What the desk is arguing
The desk frames this as a significant indication of how geopolitical developments may shape oil supply chains moving forward. According to UBS, Iran retains firm control over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for global energy shipments post-conflict, which continues to raise flags around potential disruptions in supply and pricing dynamics.
Moreover, the commentary we've seen recently indicates that shipping volumes through the Strait are currently very weak, maintaining concerns about oil prices—though in the near term, these pressures appear manageable. For instance, Paul Donovan mentions the current oil flows as remaining 'somewhere between very little and non-existent.'
Where it sits in our coverage
Current forecasts from banks place expectations for energy currencies in a range reflecting uncertainty regarding geopolitical impacts. Specifically, jpmorgan suggests a target of 1.10 for its Dec-26 projections, while bofa maintains a more cautious stance at 1.04.
This divergence indicates a wider consensus among firms, with the desk's interpretation potentially sitting at the higher end of expectations going forward, signifying a risk of overshooting based on geopolitical developments.
How other firms see it
Analysts at jpmorgan and citi align with a more optimistic stance, reflecting a conditional view that oil prices may stabilize in the coming months, contingent on the geopolitical landscape. In contrast, bofa expresses a bearish outlook, reflecting skepticism about the ability of the oil markets to rebound without further clarity or resolution.
Related currency pairs worth monitoring include USD/JPY, as it tends to react to broader market risk sentiment shaped by geopolitical tensions. Also, evaluate oil-related currency movements, given the established link to energy price fluctuations.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Iran and Oman have initiated a toll-sharing agreement for the Strait of Hormuz, signaling ongoing Iranian control over the vital shipping lane.
- 02Current shipping volumes are extremely low, with supply pressures expected to remain stable in the near term.
- 03The alignment of banks reflects a broad divergence in expectations regarding the geopolitical risks impacting oil supply.
- 04Traders should closely monitor geopolitical events and their potential impacts on key currency pairs.
Market implications
Traders should watch the stability of oil prices in relation to geopolitical developments in the Strait of Hormuz, along with the performance of USD/JPY as a gauge of market risk sentiment. A firm resistance level to note would be 1.10 for currencies sensitive to oil flows.
Risks to this view
Any escalation in regional conflicts or adverse developments in OPEC+ production strategies could lead to a sharp revision in expected supply and demand dynamics, potentially reversing the current bullish tone seen in energy-related currencies.
Good morning, this is Paul Donovan, Chief Economist at UBS Global Wealth Management. It's seven o'clock in the morning London time on Thursday the 27th of August. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has reported that Iran and Oman have come to a fee-sharing agreement for future passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
This is the closest thing markets have had to an official confirmation that the new structure will include fees and it emphasises that Iran is unlikely to give up control of the Strait even if shared with Oman after the war. It does not mean that the Strait is reopened in the near term and shipping volume and the ensuing flow of oil remains somewhere between very little and non-existent. There's nothing in this to particularly alarm markets in the near term.
Yesterday's U.S. personal consumer expenditure price deflator data confirmed the existing costs of the war for the U.S. consumer. The figures were generally as expected and that should allow the U.S. Federal Reserve to continue with its on-hold strategy in the near term.
In the next couple of months some conveniently timed revisions to the calculations will lower the headline and core inflation rates. However, that revision process is not going to change the inflation experience of ordinary U.S. households as the revisions are generally applied to abstract prices people don't actually pay in the real world. That means that the affordability crisis and the political consequences from that will remain unchanged even if pressures on the U.S.
Federal Reserve shift. The Bank of Korea has changed rates with a generally expected quarter-point rate increase overnight. The Korean economy has been experiencing genuine economic activity from the global excitement at the shiny new toy of artificial intelligence.
Korea provides the components and that means that there is increased manufacturing activity and profitability. The benefits of that have then been filtering out into the economy via wealth effects and some income growth, meaning that the growth implications for Korea are somewhat more broadly felt than has been the case with other countries' AI-related growth activity. There's some trade data coming out of the United States today which has political resonance as the U.S. administration continues to threaten still more tariffs on U.S. importers of Canadian goods.
The data should also emphasise how much of the U.S. artificial intelligence spending is leaking out of the U.S. economy. Most of the technology required has to be imported, although of course investment in AI also involves spending on domestic economic activity too, construction workers, electricity generation and the like. That's all for today, have a good day.
This material has been prepared and published by the Global Wealth Management Business of UBS Switzerland AG, regulated by FINMA in Switzerland. It's subsidiaries or affiliates, collectively referred to as UBS. In the USA, UBS Financial Services Inc. is a subsidiary of UBS AG and a member of FINRA SIPC.
The investment views have been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This material is for your information only and it is not intended as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product. The analysis contained herein does not constitute a personal investment recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, investment strategies, financial situation and needs of any specific recipient.
This material may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. Please visit www.ubs.com forward slash CIO hyphen disclaimer to read the full legal disclaimer applicable to this material.
Sources & References
How we cover this story