A new round of tariff woes: disturbing but not disruptive (for now)
Lead — The narrative surrounding U.S. trade policy has intensified with the announcement of new tariffs on Canadian goods, but markets remain unfazed, suggesting a broader narrative of unfulfilled threats. Per the full note source, the impact of tariff announcements has been largely muted, with policymakers like Trump leveraging tariffs more for negotiation than economic disruption. This dynamic paints a picture of heightened tension without immediate consequence, crucial for traders positioning in the FX landscape.
What the desk is arguing
The current landscape of U.S. trade policy paints a scenario where new tariffs are perceived as alarming yet lacking immediate disruptive power. Per the full note source, President Trump's recent tariff measures on Canada amplify ongoing trade tensions, reflecting a strategic maneuver rather than a full-scale economic assault.
Moreover, the desk underscores that historically, the implementation of tariffs has often fallen short of the initial alarm they provoke, as seen in past U.S. trade actions. Given that Canadian goods have seen a significant tariff rate increase of 50%, the immediate economic impact appears limited due to carve-outs for critical sectors. This suggests a focus more on negotiation leverage than severe economic fallout.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for USD/CAD sits at 1.075, reflecting a range from 1.04 to 1.12 according to our tracked firms. In this context, particular attention goes to: - jpmorgan with a target of 1.10 for Mar 26 - bofa with a notably lower target of 1.04 for the same tenor.
This stance, with a target aligned with the upper bound of expectations, diverges from bofa, which forecasts a weaker CAD against the dollar in its economic outlook.
How other firms see it
Firms like jpmorgan remain aligned with our perspective, bolstering the view that trade tensions will not immediately destabilize the currency markets. Conversely, bofa articulates a more pessimistic outlook, anticipating further declines in CAD due to ongoing trade disputes.
Traders should also watch movements in related pairs such as EUR/USD, especially as it reflects shifting U.S. trade sentiment impacting overall investor risk appetite and influencing currency strength.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01Recent U.S. tariffs on Canada highlight a tactical approach in trade negotiations rather than an immediate economic threat.
- 02Markets currently view new tariffs as alarming yet non-disruptive, reflecting a history of muted responses to tariff announcements.
- 03USD/CAD is positioned at a consensus target of 1.075, with a notable divergence in outlook from different firms.
- 04Close scrutiny of related pairs like EUR/USD can provide insights into broader FX market sentiment amid trade tensions.
Market implications
With the USD/CAD hovering at the consensus level of 1.075, traders should closely monitor any shifts around this level as negotiations progress. Any further announcements or escalations in tariffs could serve as potential catalysts for market movement, particularly as the situation unfolds in the coming weeks.
Risks to this view
The potential for a sudden escalation of retaliatory actions from Canada or adverse economic data could invalidate the current bullish stance on USD/CAD. Key economic indicators or significant shifts in the negotiation landscape could significantly alter risk perception, leading to CAD appreciation against the USD.
Articles A new round of tariff woes: disturbing but not disruptive (for now) Published 15:08 Trade United States Share X LinkedIn E-mail Copy link Share X LinkedIn E-mail Copy link Download Just when it seemed the summer break was within reach, a new round of trade tensions is already looming. August is increasingly shaping up to be another summer month dominated by trade disputes and tariff headlines Carsten Brzeski The last 12 months have shown that US tariff announcements tend to be far more dramatic than their eventual implementation. Trade tensions are back.
While markets have been focusing on the war in the Middle East and the renewed rise in energy prices, the last two weeks have again been very busy on trade and tariffs, even by the standards of last year. Here is the latest state of play: Canada gets hit hardest. On 20 July, US President Donald Trump signed three proclamations imposing 50% tariffs on Canadian goods under Section 338, citing discriminatory treatment of US exports, effective 19 August, with carve-outs for energy, potash, critical minerals, fish, and goods already under Section 232.
Section 338 (which dates from the Smoot-Hawley era in the 1930s) is a new legal frontier and, so far, has been untested in court. The new tariffs on Canadian imports are another sign that the North American trade pact is now formally on its way out. Trump's decision not to extend the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on 1 July triggered a 10-year wind-down process.
That mechanism is doing exactly what it was designed to do: create negotiating leverage. This week, US and Mexican officials launched a third round of bilateral talks in Mexico City, focusing on technical issues related to steel, aluminium, automobiles and labour standards. For now, it appears that Washington is seeking to negotiate a bilateral successor agreement with Mexico while increasingly treating Canada as an adversary.
There are also clear efforts to respond to the Supreme Court's February ruling that struck down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The administration’s emergency fix was to invoke Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974: a temporary balance-of-payments surcharge that Congress capped at 15% and limited to 150 days. As a result, it will automatically expire at 12:01 a.m. on 24 July, exactly 150 days after it came into effect.
That was always scaffolding, never the building. The permanent replacement began to take shape on 12 March, when the US Trade Representative launched Section 301 investigations into forced labour as part of an explicit strategy to rebuild the tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. The Section 301 action covers roughly 60 economies – about 99% of US import value – in two tiers: 10% tariffs on 14 economies including the EU, UK, Canada and Mexico, and 12.5% on 46 others, including China, Vietnam, India and Japan.
Sources & References
How we cover this story