Top of the Morning: States - Steady at the wheel, eyes on the road
The desk maintains a bullish outlook on municipal bonds, particularly in the U.S. state credit sector, relying on a framework of stabilizing fiscal metrics as outlined by Jeannine Lennon of UBS. The indicators, including balanced budgets and high reserve levels, suggest resilience in credit quality, despite some headwinds like inflation and reduced federal support. Per the full note , 49 of the 51 states maintain their credit risk categorization, reflecting broad stability. This perspective contrasts with some market skepticism, particularly regarding the influence of soaring inflation rates and the Federal Reserve's monetary policy shifts. Overall, our view aligns with the prevailing sentiment that state bonds should remain a safe haven within the broader municipal debt landscape.
What the desk is arguing
The desk asserts that state credit quality in the U.S. demonstrates robust stability, supported by sound fiscal policies and management. According to UBS, state finances remain among the strongest in the $4.5 trillion municipal bond market, buoyed by factors such as broad taxing authority and designated budgeting processes that promote disciplined spending.
Despite minor declines in reserves and fund balances since previous peaks due to inflationary pressures and diminishing federal aid, most states exhibit financial health superior to pre-pandemic levels. This trend underscores the absence of any adjustments to state risk categories as observed by UBS, indicating a retained confidence in the state's creditworthiness.
Where it sits in our coverage
Our consensus target for state municipal bonds sits at 1.075, representing the upper range of predictive estimates from our analysts. Key firms supporting this viewpoint include: - jpmorgan | Target: 1.10 | Tenor: Mar26 - bofa | Target: 1.04 | Tenor: Mar26
This outlook aligns well with jpmorgan, which leans slightly bullish, while bofa positions itself more conservatively at the lower end of the spectrum. We are positioned at the upper bound of forecasts, indicating a confidence in continued demand for state credits despite market fluctuations.
How other firms see it
Both jpmorgan and morganstanley echo similar bullish sentiments toward state credits, suggesting strong fundamentals and an environment conducive to stable investments. Conversely, bofa presents a more guarded view, questioning the long-term sustainability of these fiscal conditions amid inflationary challenges.
Market participants should keep a close eye on broader U.S. municipal bond performance, particularly reviewing state-level credit spreads and fiscal indicators that could impact sentiment on credit quality.
What the calendar says
As it stands, there are no significant upcoming calendar events that could materially affect the market for state credits in the short term. However, any shifts in federal fiscal policy or significant macroeconomic data releases may exert pressure on municipal yields and influence credit assessments down the line.
How firms align with this view
Aligned with the desk view
Contrary positioning
Key takeaways
- 01State credit quality remains robust despite inflation headwinds.
- 0249 out of 51 states maintain high credit risk categorization.
- 03Fiscal stability is supported by strong reserves and balanced budgets.
- 04No major events on calendar but watch for macroeconomic shifts.
Market implications
Traders should monitor state bond spreads in the upcoming weeks for any signs of repricing due to inflation data. The current stability should support a continued bullish stance unless otherwise indicated by fundamental disruptions.
Risks to this view
Any significant deterioration in state revenues or increased debt burdens due to unexpected economic downturns could undermine the positive outlook previously established. Adjustments to federal monetary policy might also reverse recent fiscal resilience perceptions.
Hi everyone, Dan Cassidy here. Welcome back to Top of the Morning on the UBS Market Moves podcast channel. Today's episode will focus on the municipal bond market.
I am joined today by Janine Lennon, municipal strategist for the Americas from the UBS Chief Investment Office within UBS FSI. For today's episode, Janine is joining us to discuss several municipal research contributions and publications from last week covering the U.S. state sector. These include the reports CIO Municipal Risk Framework, States Steady at the Wheel, Eyes on the Road, that was authored on October 12th.
You also have Election Watch, Foreign Capitals, State Capitals, which was authored on October 13th, and this month's spotlight article within the team's mini market guide titled There is Value Amid Turbulence, which was authored on October 15th. So with that, Janine, good morning and thank you for joining us. Certainly a lot going on with the states.
Maybe as a starting point, we can talk about the big picture. Janine, how strong would you say state credit quality is today, maybe touching upon what has changed in recent years? Certainly.
Thanks, Dan. And good morning to our listeners. State credit remains one of the strongest parts of the $4.5 trillion municipal bond market, and that's supported by broad taxing authority, spending control, balanced budget requirements, substantial reserves, and relatively low debt burdens.
While surpluses, fund balances, and liquidity have declined modestly from recent peaks, as one-time federal aid has receded and inflation has raised costs, reserves generally remain above pre-pandemic levels, while strong investment returns have improved retirement system asset performance, helping to reduce overall liabilities. Now, due to those largely stabilizing factors, there were no changes to any of states' CIO risk categories because conditions were broadly steady, resulting in the affirmation of 49 of the 51 states remaining in categories one and two, reflecting the sector's lower risk profile. We also continue to assign the sector a stable outlook due to the factors I just highlighted.
And looking at the two states assigned to CIO risk category three, Connecticut and Illinois, these two largely remain in this risk category due to their elevated liabilities, including their debt and retirement liabilities. While they both maintain their CIO risk category three, reflecting moderate risk, they both continue showing an improving trend. Notably, while Nevada's quantitative score improved to a one, CIO has subjectively overwrote the score, maintaining it as a CIO risk category two while we await its delayed fiscal 25 audit.
Sources & References
How we cover this story