On this page · 4 sections▾
Cross-firm coverage of DXY for the December 2026 forecast horizon is presently empty: no live spot is available, no firm has submitted a Dec-2026 target to the database, and dispersion across the panel is therefore undefined. The index sits in a state of formal neutrality — not because banks agree on direction, but because no aggregable signal exists yet.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (DXY): unavailable
- Cross-firm consensus (Dec-2026 median target): unavailable
- Dispersion (max − min across firms): none — zero firms in database
- Gap vs spot: unavailable
- Most-bullish firm / target: none on record
- Most-bearish firm / target: none on record
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
No firm forecasts are currently recorded in the database. The table will populate as submissions are received.
What Does a Zero-Firm Panel Mean for Reading DXY Direction?
Q1–Q4 2026 DXY targets across 17 firms, with cross-firm median path and 25–75th-percentile band on terminal targets.
Source: Nomura · Commerzbank · Deutsche Bank · Goldman Sachs +13 more
17 firms aggregated · as of 2026-05-29 06:30 UTC
An empty forecast panel is not a neutral signal in the conventional sense — it is an absence of signal, which carries its own interpretive weight. When institutional desks have not yet committed published targets to a horizon, it typically reflects one of three conditions: the horizon is still too distant for confident point-estimate publication; internal views are in active revision following a macro inflection; or coverage has simply not been submitted to this aggregation layer.
For DXY specifically, the absence of dispersion data is notable because the index functions as the summary statistic of every bilateral USD view. A bank publishing a EUR/USD target of 1.15 is implicitly expressing a DXY view; the same is true of USD/JPY, USD/CHF, and the commodity-currency pairs. The fact that FX Bank Forecast's full forecast directory shows no aggregated DXY submissions for December 2026 suggests the bilateral views — if they exist — have not yet been reconciled into an index-level call.
Practically, this means there is no consensus level at which to test the tape, and no outlier firm to flag as the tail risk to a crowded position. Readers tracking DXY positioning should treat the current state as a data gap rather than a directional read.
Where Would Consensus and Tape Most Likely Diverge?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 path with revision arrows from each firm's prior published target. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Nomura · Commerzbank · Deutsche Bank · Goldman Sachs +13 more
17 firms aggregated · as of 2026-05-29 06:30 UTC
Without published targets, any divergence analysis is necessarily structural rather than numerical. Historically, DXY consensus and spot tend to diverge most sharply at two types of juncture: when the Federal Reserve's rate path shifts faster than bank forecast cycles can absorb, and when a non-USD G10 central bank surprises in a direction that reprices two or three DXY-weighted crosses simultaneously.
The EUR has a weight of roughly 57.6% in the DXY basket. Any material EUR/USD revision by a major European bank — say, a firm covering the ECB cycle closely — will mechanically shift the implied DXY consensus more than an equivalent-sized revision in USD/JPY or USD/CAD. This is the structural leverage point where a single firm's bilateral view can create the largest wedge between the index-level consensus and the tape.
Once firms begin submitting December 2026 targets, the DXY currency page will surface the precise level where the spread between the most-bullish and most-bearish submissions is widest. That spread — the dispersion metric — is the single most useful number for gauging whether the consensus is a genuine central tendency or a statistical artifact of a bimodal distribution.
Which Analytical Frameworks Apply When the Panel Is Empty?
Three approaches remain tractable in the absence of point estimates.
First, bilateral proxy aggregation: if EUR/USD, USD/JPY, GBP/USD, USD/CAD, USD/SEK, and USD/CHF targets are available from any firm, a basket-weighted DXY implied level can be computed. This is arithmetically straightforward and produces a synthetic consensus that can be compared to spot once spot is available. Readers with access to bilateral forecasts from institutions such as Goldman Sachs FX Research, Deutsche Bank FX Strategy, or BNP Paribas FX Research can perform this calculation directly.
Second, options market implied levels: 12-month risk reversals on EUR/USD and USD/JPY embed a market-implied skew that, when basket-weighted, approximates the directional lean of the options community — a useful cross-check against sell-side point estimates.
Third, CFTC positioning: net speculative positioning in DXY futures (or in the weighted bilateral futures) provides a real-money directional read that is independent of bank forecast submissions and updates weekly.
None of these substitutes for a populated cross-firm panel, but each narrows the uncertainty band while the database fills in.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current DXY cross-firm consensus target for December 2026?
No consensus target is available. Zero firms have submitted December 2026 DXY forecasts to the database as of June 2026, leaving the median, dispersion, and gap metrics all undefined.
Which firm is the most bullish on the dollar index?
No firm is on record with a DXY target for this horizon. Once submissions are received, the most-bullish firm and its target will appear in the Key Numbers block and the comparison table above.
How wide is the spread between the highest and lowest DXY targets?
Dispersion is currently zero by default — not because all firms agree, but because no targets have been submitted. A non-trivial dispersion figure (historically 5–10 index points across a full G10 panel) should be expected once coverage populates.
Where does spot DXY stand relative to consensus?
Both spot and consensus are unavailable, so the gap cannot be computed. The tape direction relative to consensus is characterised as in line with the implied neutral bias — a placeholder that will be updated as data arrives.
→ See the full BNP Paribas FX Research FX outlook for bilateral USD views that can serve as a proxy for index-level direction until DXY-specific submissions are recorded.
Read next
More from DXY
- XAU/USD
XAU/USD Consensus Check: $4,750 Target vs $4,019 Spot — Week of July 18, 2026
XAU/USD trades at $4,018.8, roughly 15% below the 15-firm Dec-2026 consensus of $4,750, with a $2,150 spread separating the most and least bullish desks.
- USD/JPY
USD/JPY Week of July 18, 2026: Spot at 162.41, Consensus at 149.0
USD/JPY trades at 162.41, roughly 9% above the 23-firm Dec-2026 consensus of 149.0, with a 25-point dispersion signalling deep disagreement on the BoJ-Fed spread path.
- USD/KRW
USD/KRW Consensus Check: Spot at 1487 vs 1380 Target, Week of July 18, 2026
USD/KRW trades 7.79% above the 18-firm Dec-26 consensus of 1380, with a 180-point dispersion separating the most and least bearish desks.
Readers also opened
- EM FX
EM FX Consensus Map, Dec-2026: Six Pairs, Wide Dispersion
Across six EM pairs, consensus skews toward USD weakness by year-end, but dispersion is extreme in INR and KRW, leaving crowded shorts exposed.
- USD/CHF
USD/CHF Consensus at 0.78: Spot Trades 3.65% Above Dec-26 Target
USD/CHF spot at 0.80844 sits 3.65% above the 20-firm Dec-26 consensus of 0.78, with a 0.09 spread signalling meaningful regime disagreement.
- EUR/USD
EUR/USD Trades 2.4% Below Consensus as 28 Desks Hold 1.17 Dec-26 Target
EUR/USD spot at 1.1421 sits 2.39% below the 28-firm median Dec-26 target of 1.17, with a 0.20 range separating the most and least bullish desks.
Share