On this page · 4 sections▾
WTI crude trades at 78.18 as of the week of August 8, 2026 — 18.45% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0, according to the full oil bank forecast table. Across the nine WTI-benchmark desks surveyed, the spread between the most bullish and most bearish target runs 42 points, an unusually wide dispersion that reflects genuine disagreement on OPEC+ durability and Chinese demand trajectory.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (Aug 8, 2026): 78.18
- Cross-firm consensus, Dec-26 (WTI desks only, n=9): 66.0
- Dispersion (max − min): 42.0 points
- Gap, spot vs consensus: −18.45% (spot well above median target)
- Most bullish WTI desk: Mizuho at 100.0
- Most bearish WTI desk: Macquarie at 58.0
Firm-by-Firm Targets: Where Does Each Desk Stand?
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Macquarie | 58.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Bank of America | 60.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| J.P. Morgan | 61.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Citi | 65.0 (Brent) | neutral |
| Wells Fargo | 65.0 (WTI) | neutral |
| ANZ | 66.0 (WTI) | neutral |
| Morgan Stanley | 70.0 (Brent) | bearish |
| HSBC | 73.0 (WTI) | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | 80.0 (WTI) | neutral |
| UBS | 80.0 (Brent) | neutral |
| Westpac | 85.0 (WTI) | bearish |
| Barclays | 93.3 (Brent) | neutral |
| Mizuho | 100.0 (WTI) | bullish |
| Deutsche Bank | 109.0 (Brent) | bullish |
Note: Citi, UBS, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, and Deutsche Bank publish Brent-benchmark targets; those levels are not folded into the nine-desk WTI consensus or dispersion statistics.
Why Is Spot Trading So Far Above the Median Target?
The 18.45% gap between spot and the Dec-26 median is not noise. It reflects a market that is pricing near-term supply tightness more aggressively than sell-side models justify on a six-month horizon.
OPEC+ compliance has been the proximate driver. The alliance's rolling output restraint — extended through mid-2026 — has kept physical barrels off the market at a pace that surprised consensus in Q2. The question for H2 is whether that discipline holds as fiscal pressure mounts on lower-income members. Most desks assume partial unwind; the bears assume accelerated unwind.
US shale break-evens complicate the supply picture. The Permian basin's marginal cost sits in the low-to-mid 50s per barrel for established operators, meaning current spot prices are well inside profitable territory. Rig counts have responded, and the EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) projects a WTI average of 76.18 for 2026 with a Q4 path converging to 66.0 — precisely matching the bank median. That alignment between the EIA STEO Q4 path and the nine-desk median is notable: it suggests the consensus is anchored to official supply-demand balances rather than tail scenarios.
Chinese demand remains the swing variable. Refinery throughput data through mid-2026 has been mixed, with property-sector weakness suppressing diesel demand even as gasoline and jet fuel recover. Desks with the most bearish Chinese demand assumptions — Bank of America at 60.0 and J.P. Morgan at 61.0 — sit 22–23% below current spot, implying a significant demand-side correction is required to validate their targets.
The FXStreet retail poll, updated August 7, reads sideways across all three horizons: 77.75 for one week, 82.56 for one month, and 82.44 for one quarter. The one-week read sits just below spot, consistent with near-term consolidation rather than a directional break. The one-month and one-quarter reads are above spot, diverging sharply from the bank median — a split that underscores how differently positioning-driven and fundamental-driven frameworks are reading the same tape.
Which Desks Are the Outliers, and What Is Their Thesis?
Mizuho is the lonely bull among WTI-benchmark forecasters, with a Dec-26 target of 100.0 — 34 points above the next-highest WTI desk and 51% above the nine-bank median. The Mizuho view requires OPEC+ to hold cuts through year-end and Chinese demand to reaccelerate materially in H2. It also implies US shale supply response is slower than the EIA projects. That is a defensible but high-conviction call that sits well outside the distribution.
On the Brent side, Deutsche Bank carries a 109.0 Brent target — the highest level in the full table. At a typical WTI/Brent spread of roughly 3–5 dollars, that implies a WTI equivalent in the 104–106 range, making Deutsche Bank the most structurally bullish desk across both benchmarks.
Macquarie anchors the bearish end at 58.0 WTI, a level that would require spot to fall 25.8% from current levels. The Macquarie thesis leans on OPEC+ cohesion breaking down and shale supply filling the gap, compounded by a Chinese demand miss. Bank of America and J.P. Morgan cluster just above at 60.0 and 61.0 respectively, forming a bearish cohort that collectively represents the modal view among the most active commodity desks on the Street.
Goldman Sachs sits at 80.0 WTI with a neutral stance — the closest WTI-benchmark desk to current spot, implying modest downside from here but no structural break. Westpac targets 85.0 WTI but carries a bearish stance, a combination that suggests the desk expects near-term strength before a later-year reversal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price forecast consensus for December 2026?
The nine-bank WTI-benchmark median target for December 2026 stands at 66.0, representing an 18.45% decline from the August 8, 2026 spot of 78.18.
Which bank has the highest WTI oil price target?
Mizuho holds the highest WTI-benchmark target at 100.0 for December 2026; on Brent, Deutsche Bank leads at 109.0.
Which bank has the lowest WTI oil price target?
Macquarie carries the lowest WTI target at 58.0, implying a 25.8% decline from current spot levels.
What does the EIA STEO project for WTI in Q4 2026?
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook projects a 2026 WTI average of approximately 76.18, with the Q4 path converging to 66.0 — precisely in line with the nine-bank median target.
→ See the full Mizuho FX outlook for the complete rationale behind the 100.0 WTI target and how it compares to the broader bank consensus tracked at FX Bank Forecast.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Barclays →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
UBS →
Bank Forecast
Morgan Stanley →
Bank Forecast
Westpac →
Bank Forecast
Deutsche Bank →
Bank Forecast
Mizuho →
Bank Forecast
Wellsfargo →
Bank Forecast
Macquarie →
Bank Forecast
ANZ →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
JPMorgan →
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI Oil Forecast: Bank Consensus at $66 vs $78.26 Spot — Week of August 7, 2026
WTI trades 18.6% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of $66, with a $42 spread separating Mizuho's $100 bull case from Macquarie's $58 floor.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 6 2026: Spot at 77.4, Median Target 66.0
WTI spot trades 17.3% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0, with a 42-point spread separating Mizuho's 100.0 call from Macquarie's 58.0.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check: Spot at $74.86 Sits 13% Above Dec-26 Median — Week of August 5, 2026
WTI spot at $74.86 trades 13.42% above the nine-bank Dec-26 median of $66.00, with a $42 dispersion signalling deep disagreement on the supply path.
Share