On this page · 4 sections▾
WTI crude trades at $89.86 as of the week of July 24, 2026 — 37.19% above the $65.50 cross-firm median Dec-26 target drawn from ten WTI-benchmark desks tracked in the full oil bank forecast table. The $62.00 dispersion between the highest and lowest WTI targets signals that fundamental disagreement, not just directional skew, is the defining feature of this consensus.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (WTI): $89.86
- Cross-firm consensus median (Dec-26, WTI desks only): $65.50
- Dispersion (max − min): $62.00 ($58.00–$120.00)
- Gap, spot vs. consensus: −37.19% (spot well above)
- Most-bullish WTI desk: Goldman Sachs at $120.00
- Most-bearish WTI desk: Macquarie at $58.00
Firm-by-Firm Targets: Where Does Each Desk Stand?
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Macquarie | $58.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Bank of America | $60.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| J.P. Morgan | $61.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Barclays | $64.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| Citi | $65.00 (Brent) | neutral |
| Wells Fargo | $65.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| ANZ | $66.00 (WTI) | neutral |
| Morgan Stanley | $70.00 (Brent) | bearish |
| HSBC | $73.00 (WTI) | bullish |
| UBS | $80.00 (Brent) | neutral |
| Westpac | $85.00 (WTI) | bearish |
| Mizuho | $100.00 (WTI) | bullish |
| Deutsche Bank | $109.00 (Brent) | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | $120.00 (WTI) | bullish |
Note: Citi, UBS, Morgan Stanley, and Deutsche Bank publish Brent-benchmark targets; those levels are not folded into the WTI consensus statistics above.
What Is Driving the 37% Gap Between Spot and Consensus?
Three structural forces explain why spot has run so far ahead of where the median desk expects oil to settle by December.
OPEC+ supply discipline. The alliance has maintained production restraint through mid-2026, keeping physical balances tighter than most year-ahead models assumed. Saudi Arabia's unilateral cut extensions have repeatedly surprised the market to the upside. The bullish outliers — Goldman Sachs at $120.00 and Mizuho at $100.00 — assign a high probability that OPEC+ holds the line through year-end, treating any demand softness as a reason to cut further rather than defend market share.
US shale break-evens and supply elasticity. The bearish camp — Macquarie at $58.00, Bank of America at $60.00, and J.P. Morgan at $61.00 — anchors its view on US shale's demonstrated ability to ramp output at prices well below current spot. Permian break-evens for Tier-1 acreage sit broadly in the $45–$55 range; at $89.86, producers have strong incentive to accelerate completions. That incremental supply, in the bearish read, arrives just as OPEC+ discipline frays under fiscal pressure from lower-cost members.
Chinese demand uncertainty. The non-bank benchmarks are instructive here. The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook pegs WTI at $76.18 for 2026 on average, with a Q4 path of $66.00 — broadly consistent with the bank median but implying a sharper second-half decline than current spot suggests. The FXStreet poll (updated July 17) shows a one-week view of $79.88 (sideways), a one-month view of $85.22 (bullish), and a one-quarter view of $83.39 (sideways). The retail survey community is materially less bearish than the sell-side median, likely underweighting the Chinese demand drag that institutional desks flag as the primary downside risk.
Who Are the Lonely Outliers, and Are Their Cases Coherent?
Goldman Sachs is the lonely bull among WTI desks at $120.00 — a level that requires both sustained OPEC+ cohesion and a Chinese demand recovery that the consensus does not price. The internal logic is consistent: Goldman's commodity team has historically weighted geopolitical risk premia and supply-side optionality more heavily than demand-side mean reversion. At $120.00, the implied return from spot is +33.5%, making it the only desk with a materially bullish risk/reward case on a six-month horizon.
Macquarie is the lonely bear at $58.00 — below the EIA's own Q4 path of $66.00. The Macquarie thesis requires either an OPEC+ production agreement breakdown or a sharper-than-expected Chinese demand contraction, or both simultaneously. At $58.00, WTI would be trading below the marginal cost of a meaningful share of global supply, which historically triggers either demand stimulus or producer-side adjustment. The case is internally coherent but requires a confluence of negative catalysts.
On the Brent side, Deutsche Bank sits at $109.00 (Brent), the highest Brent target in the survey and consistent with its bullish stance. Morgan Stanley at $70.00 (Brent) and Citi at $65.00 (Brent) anchor the bearish-to-neutral end of the Brent distribution. The Brent-WTI spread implied across these desks is not uniform, reflecting different assumptions about Atlantic Basin differentials and North Sea production trajectories.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current WTI price and where do banks expect it to go?
WTI spot is $89.86 as of the week of July 24, 2026. The median Dec-26 target across ten WTI-benchmark bank desks is $65.50, implying a 37.19% decline from current levels if consensus proves correct.
Which bank is most bullish on WTI and which is most bearish?
Goldman Sachs holds the highest WTI target at $120.00 (bullish). Macquarie holds the lowest at $58.00 (bearish). The $62.00 gap between them is the full dispersion range in this survey.
What does the EIA STEO say about WTI for the rest of 2026?
The EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook projects WTI at $76.18 on a 2026 average basis, with a Q4 path of $66.00 — broadly in line with the bank median but implying a steeper second-half descent than the FXStreet retail poll anticipates.
Are the Brent targets in this survey comparable to the WTI consensus?
No. Citi ($65.00), UBS ($80.00), Morgan Stanley ($70.00), and Deutsche Bank ($109.00) publish Brent-denominated targets and are excluded from the $65.50 WTI median and the $62.00 dispersion figure. Brent typically trades at a premium to WTI; comparing Brent targets directly to WTI spot overstates apparent consensus alignment.
→ See the full Goldman Sachs FX and commodities outlook for the desk carrying the highest WTI target in this survey cycle.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
UBS →
Bank Forecast
Morgan Stanley →
Bank Forecast
Westpac →
Bank Forecast
Deutsche Bank →
Bank Forecast
Mizuho →
Bank Forecast
Wellsfargo →
Bank Forecast
Macquarie →
Bank Forecast
ANZ →
Bank Forecast
Barclays →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
JPMorgan →
More from WTI
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 6 2026: Spot at 77.4, Median Target 66.0
WTI spot trades 17.3% above the nine-bank median Dec-26 target of 66.0, with a 42-point spread separating Mizuho's 100.0 call from Macquarie's 58.0.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check: Spot at $74.86 Sits 13% Above Dec-26 Median — Week of August 5, 2026
WTI spot at $74.86 trades 13.42% above the nine-bank Dec-26 median of $66.00, with a $42 dispersion signalling deep disagreement on the supply path.
- WTI
WTI Consensus Check, Week of August 4, 2026: Spot at $81 vs $66 Median
WTI spot at $81.02 trades 22.76% above the nine-bank Dec-2026 median of $66.00, with a $42 range separating Mizuho's $100 bull case from Macquarie's $58 floor.
Share