On this page · 4 sections▾
AUD/USD traded at 0.6977 as of July 28, 2026 — effectively in line with the 24-firm Dec-26 consensus median of 0.70 tracked in the full AUD/USD bank forecast table, though the 0.10 dispersion between the most- and least-bullish desks signals meaningful disagreement on the three macro drivers that matter most: the RBA–Fed rate gap, China's demand trajectory, and commodity-price beta.
Key Numbers
- Live spot (July 28, 2026): 0.6977
- Cross-firm consensus, Dec-26 (24 firms): 0.70
- Dispersion (max − min): 0.10
- Gap, spot vs consensus: −0.33%
- Most bullish: Scotiabank at 0.75
- Most bearish: Mizuho at 0.65
| Firm | Dec-2026 target | Stance |
|---|---|---|
| Société Générale | 0.67 | bullish |
| Citi | 0.67 | bearish |
| UOB | 0.6835 | neutral |
| TMGM | 0.69 | neutral |
| Danske Bank | 0.69 | neutral |
| Bank of America | 0.70 | bullish |
| MUFG | 0.70 | bullish |
| HSBC | 0.70 | bullish |
| Goldman Sachs | 0.70 | bullish |
| Commerzbank | 0.71 | bullish |
| Nomura | 0.72 | bullish |
| Rabobank | 0.72 | neutral |
| ING | 0.73 | neutral |
| Scotiabank | 0.75 | neutral |
What is driving the RBA–Fed policy gap narrative this week?
The central tension in AUD/USD forecasting through year-end is the relative pace of easing between the RBA and the Fed. Desks sitting at or above the 0.70 consensus — Goldman Sachs, MUFG, HSBC, and Bank of America — broadly price a scenario in which the Fed moves first and faster on cuts, compressing the negative rate differential that has capped AUD/USD for much of the post-pandemic cycle. BofA's published spot reference of 0.6400 against a 0.70 target implies roughly 9.4% of anticipated AUD appreciation, the most aggressive directional call among the named desks, and rests on the assumption that Fed easing outpaces any RBA action.
Nomura frames a similar argument from a different entry point: with a spot reference near 0.6700, its 0.72 target implies approximately 7.5% upside, anchored to a view that the RBA holds rates longer than the market prices, effectively widening the spread in AUD's favour as the Fed cuts. Rabobank reaches the same 0.72 target but with a more modest implied move of roughly 2.0%, suggesting its spot reference is already closer to current levels and the rate-spread repricing is largely in train.
On the other side, Citi stands as the most explicit bear among the named firms, targeting 0.67 from a spot reference of 0.7200 — a 6.9% decline that implies the Fed pauses or reverses course while the RBA is forced into deeper cuts by a softening domestic labour market. That divergence from the consensus direction is the sharpest single-desk outlier in the current table.
Where is dispersion widest, and which desks sit at the extremes?
Per-firm Q1→Q4 path with revision arrows from each firm's prior published target. Sorted ascending by terminal target.
Source: Mizuho · Citi · Société Générale · JPMorgan +20 more
24 firms aggregated · as of 2026-07-28 21:06 UTC
The 0.10 range between the top target (Scotiabank at 0.75) and the bottom (Mizuho at 0.65, not among the 14 most recently updated desks but captured in the full 24-firm snapshot) is wide by the standards of a pair that has historically traded in a 0.06–0.08 annual range. That spread reflects genuine macro disagreement rather than stale forecasts.
Scotiabank at 0.75 carries a neutral stance designation despite holding the highest target in the panel — a combination that suggests the desk sees the move as a base-case drift rather than a high-conviction tactical call. ING at 0.73 and Nomura and Rabobank both at 0.72 form a cluster of above-consensus targets, all of which embed some combination of Fed easing, China stabilisation, and resilient iron-ore demand.
At the lower end, Société Générale and Citi share a 0.67 target but carry opposite stances — SG is bullish on AUD/USD from a lower spot reference, while Citi is bearish from a higher one. That divergence in implied direction from an identical target level illustrates how much the starting-point assumption matters when reading year-end forecasts out of context.
How does China and commodity beta factor into the dispersion?
Iron ore remains the most direct transmission mechanism between Chinese fixed-asset investment and AUD/USD. Desks with the highest targets tend to embed a scenario of incremental Chinese stimulus feeding through to steel demand and, by extension, to Australian export revenues and terms-of-trade support for the currency. The 0.72–0.75 cluster implicitly prices iron-ore prices holding or recovering from mid-cycle lows.
The 0.67–0.69 cluster prices the opposite: either a China demand disappointment that pressures bulk commodity prices, or a domestic Australian story in which softer consumption and a cooling housing market give the RBA room — or necessity — to cut more aggressively than the Fed. UOB at 0.6835 with a neutral stance sits in this camp, seeing modest AUD underperformance of roughly 1.1% from its spot reference without committing to a directional catalyst.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does AUD/USD spot stand relative to consensus as of July 28, 2026?
Spot at 0.6977 is 0.33% below the 24-firm Dec-26 median of 0.70, placing the pair effectively in line with consensus and implying a neutral aggregate bias across the panel.
How wide is the forecast range across banks?
Dispersion across all 24 firms is 0.10, running from Mizuho's 0.65 floor to Scotiabank's 0.75 ceiling — an unusually wide spread that reflects unresolved disagreement on the Fed–RBA easing sequence and China's growth path.
Which firm has the most bullish AUD/USD target?
Scotiabank holds the highest published Dec-26 target at 0.75, though its stance is designated neutral, suggesting the desk treats that level as a base-case drift rather than an aggressive directional call.
Which firm is the most bearish on AUD/USD?
Citi carries the most explicitly bearish stance among the named desks, targeting 0.67 from a spot reference of 0.7200 — implying approximately 6.9% of AUD/USD downside and pricing a scenario in which the RBA cuts more aggressively than the Fed.
→ See the full Scotiabank FX outlook for the rate-spread and commodity assumptions behind the panel's highest AUD/USD target.
Read next
Firms covered in this article
Bank Forecast
Nomura →
Bank Forecast
Rabobank →
Bank Forecast
Bank of America →
Bank Forecast
Uob →
Bank Forecast
Societe Generale →
Bank Forecast
Citi →
Bank Forecast
MUFG →
Bank Forecast
Tmgm →
Bank Forecast
Scotiabank →
Bank Forecast
HSBC →
Bank Forecast
Danskebank →
Bank Forecast
ING →
Bank Forecast
Goldman Sachs →
Bank Forecast
Commerzbank →
Continue tracking AUD/USD
More from AUD/USD
- AUD/USD
AUD/USD: Consensus Targets 0.70 by Dec-2026, Spread Spans 0.10
AUD/USD trades at 0.6941, roughly 0.84% below the 24-firm Dec-2026 median of 0.70, with a 0.10 dispersion reflecting sharply divided views on China and the RBA-Fed gap.
- AUD/USD
AUD/USD Consensus Check: 0.6992 Spot vs 0.70 Target, Week of July 27, 2026
AUD/USD trades at 0.6992, a mere 0.12% below the 24-firm Dec-26 median of 0.70, masking a 0.10 dispersion range from Mizuho's 0.65 to Scotiabank's 0.75.
- AUD/USD
AUD/USD Consensus Check: Week of July 26, 2026
AUD/USD trades at 0.6984, within 0.23% of the 24-firm Dec-26 median target of 0.70, but a 0.10 spread between Scotiabank and Mizuho signals deep structural disagreement.
Share